...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Military and Strategic Studies >Pick your Poison: Assessing the Strategic Effectiveness of Decapitation via Drone Strikes by Looking at the Organizational Dynamics of Targeted Groups
【24h】

Pick your Poison: Assessing the Strategic Effectiveness of Decapitation via Drone Strikes by Looking at the Organizational Dynamics of Targeted Groups

机译:选择您的毒药:通过查看目标群体的组织动态来评估通过无人驾驶罢工斩首的战略有效性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Leadership targeting, or decapitation, which involves the removal of an organization’s leader, has been utilized in various military conflicts. The use of drones has been particularly consequential in such schemes, earning themselves the reputation of being “Washington’s weapon of choice.” The existing literature on leadership targeting gravitates around the question of the practice’s strategic effectiveness, focusing on the targeted groups’ internal characteristics to explain their (in)ability to withstand decapitation. However, this literature overlooks a key feature of terrorist groups, namely their identity’s organizational dynamics. Highlighting the importance of group identities in determining the outcome of decapitations, this article fills this void. Looking at the cases of al Qaeda in Iraq and Ansar al-Sharia in Yemen, it argues that groups which have a global identity are likely to retain cohesion when their leaders are the victim of decapitation while groups whose identity stems from an ethnic or tribal lineage tend to fragment, therefore creating “veto players.”
机译:针对领导者的定位或斩首,涉及罢免组织的领导者,已在各种军事冲突中使用。在此类计划中,无人机的使用尤其重要,从而使自己赢得了“华盛顿的首选武器”的美誉。现有有关领导力目标的文献倾向于围绕这种做法的战略有效性问题,着眼于目标群体的内部特征,以解释其(无法)承受斩首的能力。但是,这些文献忽略了恐怖组织的主要特征,即其身份的组织动态。本文强调了群体认同在确定斩首结果中的重要性,填补了这一空白。观察伊拉克基地组织和也门安萨尔伊斯兰教义的案例,认为具有全球性身分的团体在领导人被斩首之害时,可能保持凝聚力,而其身分则来自种族或部落血统的团体趋于分散,因此产生了“否决权”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号