...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >Assessing the reporting quality in randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for postherpetic neuralgia using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines
【24h】

Assessing the reporting quality in randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for postherpetic neuralgia using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines

机译：使用CONSORT声明和STRICTA指南评估针灸治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的随机对照试验中的报告质量

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: This study evaluates the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on acupuncture use for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia and explores related factors. Methods: The following six databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, VIP, CNKI, and SinoMed, were systematically searched from their inception to December 2018. RCTs using acupuncture as an intervention for postherpetic neuralgia were selected and incorporated in this study. The reporting quality was assessed based on the CONSORT statement and the STRICTA guidelines. Regression analyses were also conducted on pre-specified study characteristics searching for factors associated with reporting quality. Results: A total of 137 RCTs were included in this study. The CONSORT based median OQS was 12 (minimum 3, maximum 29). Of the items comprised in the statement, ten were sufficiently reported (reported in over 70% of trials). The remaining fifty-five items were poorly reported (reported by fewer than 5% of trials). The STRICTA based median OQS was 9 (minimum 2, maximum 15). The results showed that eight of the comprised items were well reported (reported in over 70% of trials), and only three were incompletely reported (reported in fewer than 20% of trials). Based on the CONSORT statement related analysis, a post-2010 publication (β coefficient 2.394, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.168–3.620) and funding (β coefficient 4.456, 95% CI: 3.009–5.903) represented independent and significant predictors of a high overall reporting quality. However, only a funding source (β coefficient 1.305, 95% CI 0.219–2.391) was associated with an increased OQS based on STRICTA analysis. Conclusion: The findings indicated that RCTs on acupuncture for PHN generally had a sub-optimal reporting quality, a situation that improved for those published after 2010 or with funding sources. Therefore, rigorous adherence to the CONSORT statement and the STRICTA guidelines should be emphasized in future studies.
机译：背景：本研究评估针灸治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的随机对照试验（RCT）的报告质量，并探讨相关因素。方法：从开始到2018年12月，系统搜索了以下六个数据库PubMed，Embase，Cochrane图书馆，VIP，CNKI和SinoMed。选择了以针刺作为带状疱疹后神经痛干预措施的RCT，并将其纳入本研究。报告质量是根据CONSORT声明和STRICTA指南进行评估的。还针对预定的研究特征进行了回归分析，以寻找与报告质量相关的因素。结果：这项研究共包括137个RCT。基于CONSORT的OQS中位数为12（最低3，最高29）。声明中包含的项目中，有十个已得到充分报告（超过70％的试验报告）。其余的五十五项报告不佳（报告不到试验的5％）。基于STRICTA的OQS中位数为9（最低2，最高15）。结果表明，所包括的项目中有八项得到了很好的报告（超过70％的试验报告），只有三项没有得到完全报告（只有不到20％的试验报告）。根据CONSORT声明相关分析，2010年后的出版物（β系数2.394，95％置信区间[CI] 1.168–3.620）和资金（β系数4.456，95％CI：3.009–5.903）代表了以下因素的独立且重要的预测指标较高的整体报告质量。但是，根据STRICTA分析，只有一个资金来源（β系数1.305，95％CI 0.219–2.391）与OQS增加相关。结论：研究结果表明，针对针刺性前列腺癌的RCT通常报告质量较差，这种情况对于2010年后发表的文献或有资金来源的文献有所改善。因此，在以后的研究中应强调严格遵守CONSORT声明和STRICTA指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号