• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Palaeogeography >The Vérard et al. (2015) method for 3D palaeogeographic reconstructions: How solid is its base?
【24h】

The Vérard et al. (2015) method for 3D palaeogeographic reconstructions: How solid is its base?

机译：维拉德等。 （2015）的3D古地理重建方法：其基础有多牢固？

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Abstract Veacute;rard and co-workers proposed in an earlier issue of this journal a method to reconstruct the 3D palaeogeography “anywhere in the world at any time”. The present contribution is a discussion of some of the assumptions on which the method of Veacute;rard et al. is based. The reason for this discussion is that the method will give, at least seemingly, illogical outcomes for numerous situations. Moreover, some assumptions used by Veacute;rard and his team pose theoretical problems. It is deduced that the method developed by Veacute;rard and co-workers may occasionally help, indeed, to obtain a rough picture of the altitude of the sedimentary surface on the continents and of the depth of the sedimentary surface in the oceans in the geological past. The outcomes should, however, be treated with utmost care as several of the assumptions on which the interpretative 3D method is based have no solid basis, so that even the rough outcomes of the method must be considered questionable.
机译：摘要Veacute; rard及其同事在该期刊的较早一期中提出了一种“在世界任何地方，任何时间”重建3D古地理的方法。本贡献是对Veacute; rard等人的方法所基于的一些假设的讨论。是基于。进行此讨论的原因是，对于许多情况，该方法至少会产生看似不合逻辑的结果。此外，Veacute; rard和他的团队使用的一些假设提出了理论上的问题。据推断，Veacute; rard和他的同事开发的方法有时可能确实有助于获得有关大陆上沉积面高度和地质中海洋沉积面深度的粗略图。过去。但是，应谨慎对待结果，因为解释性3D方法所基于的几个假设没有坚实的基础，因此，即使该方法的粗略结果也必须被认为是可疑的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号