...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology: official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology >Analysis on anatomical references to assess the coronal alignment of tibial and femoral cuts in mega prosthetic knee replacement
【24h】

Analysis on anatomical references to assess the coronal alignment of tibial and femoral cuts in mega prosthetic knee replacement

机译:分析解剖参考以评估大型人工膝关节置换术中胫骨和股骨切口的冠状排列

获取原文
           

摘要

class="Heading">Background class="Para">In megaprosthetic knee replacement, surgeons use cutting guides that depend on anatomLevel of evidence class="Para">ical references to determine the ideal cutting plane alignment. In this work, we investigated the accuracy of using femoral cortical surfaces and tibial canal portions as the references. The study aims to improve the design and use of the cutting guides. class="Heading">Materials and methods class="Para">Sixty-one knee scanograms of 33 patients (mean age around 20?years) diagnosed with osteogenic sarcoma and undergoing distal femur megaprosthetic surgery were acquired. Angles between the selected anatomical references and axis perpendicular to the ideal cutting plane (anatomical axis for femur and mechanical axis for tibia) were measured for both femur and tibia, in coronal view. The smaller the magnitude of the angles, the better the anatomical reference is. class="Heading">Results class="Para">At the central femoral region, on average, both lateral and medial cortical surfaces give accurate alignment of the ideal cutting plane (0.6° and 0.8°, respectively), with no significant difference (p??0.01). At the distal region, the lateral cortical surface gives significantly better alignment compared to the medial cortical surface (p??0.01), but not as accurate (1.4°) as in the central region. For tibia, the central tibial canal gives significantly accurate alignment of the ideal cutting plane (?0.3°) on average, compared to the proximal tibial canal (p??0.01). class="Heading">Conclusions class="Para">For a femoral cut, both lateral and medial cortical surfaces are the best anatomical references, but only at the central region. For a tibial cut, the central anatomical axis is the best reference. class="Heading">Level of evidence class="Para">IV.
机译:class =“ Heading”>背景 class =“ Para”>在人工膝关节置换术中,外科医生使用的切割指南取决于解剖结构的证据水平 class =“ Para”>参考文献确定理想的切割平面对齐方式。在这项工作中,我们调查了使用股骨皮质表面和胫骨管部分作为参考的准确性。这项研究旨在改善切割指南的设计和使用。 class =“ Heading”>材料和方法 class =“ Para”> 33例患者的61个膝关节造影图(平均年龄约20岁)被诊断为成骨肉瘤并接受股骨远端大假体手术。在冠状视图中,测量了股骨和胫骨的选定解剖参考与垂直于理想切割平面的轴(股骨的解剖轴和胫骨的机械轴)之间的角度。角的大小越小,解剖学参考就越好。 class =“ Heading”>结果 class =“ Para”>在股骨中央区域,平均而言,两者皮质的外侧和内侧表面可精确对准理想的切割平面(分别为0.6°和0.8°),而没有明显的差异(<0.01, p ?)。在远端区域,与内侧皮质表面相比,外侧皮质表面具有更好的对齐方式( p ?<?0.01),但不如内侧皮质表面那样精确(1.4°)中央区域。对于胫骨,与胫骨近端相比,胫骨中央平均平均理想切割平面(?0.3°)显着精确对齐( p ?<?0.01)。 class =“ Heading”>结论 class =“ Para”>对于股骨切开术来说,外侧和内侧皮质表面都是最好的解剖学参考,但仅在中央区域。对于胫骨切口,中央解剖轴是最佳参考。 class =“ Heading”>证据水平 class =“ Para”> IV。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号