首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology: official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology >Are clinical outcomes affected by type of plate used for management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures?
【24h】

Are clinical outcomes affected by type of plate used for management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures?

机译:临床结局是否受用于治疗中枢锁骨骨折的钢板类型的影响?

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundOpen reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using plate osteosynthesis for midshaft clavicle fractures is often complicated by the prominence of the implant due to the subcutaneous position of the clavicle. Reoperation rates for symptomatic clavicle plate removal have been reported to be as high as 53%. We sought to determine to which degree do clinical outcomes (all cause reoperation rate and rate of fracture union) differ between types of clavicle plates.
机译:背景技术由于锁骨的皮下位置,植入物的突出常常使使用板式骨合成术进行开放复位和内固定(ORIF)复杂化。有症状的锁骨板切除再手术率据报道高达53%。我们试图确定锁骨板类型之间的临床结局(所有原因的再手术率和骨折愈合率)有多大程度的差异。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号