...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pathology Informatics >Different tracks for pathology informatics fellowship training: Experiences of and input from trainees in a large multisite fellowship program
【24h】

Different tracks for pathology informatics fellowship training: Experiences of and input from trainees in a large multisite fellowship program

机译：病理学信息学研究金培训的不同途径：大型多站点研究金计划中学员的经验和意见

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background:Pathology Informatics is a new field; a field that is still defining itself even as it begins the formalization, accreditation, and board certification process. At the same time, Pathology itself is changing in a variety of ways that impact informatics, including subspecialization and an increased use of data analysis. In this paper, we examine how these changes impact both the structure of Pathology Informatics fellowship programs and the fellows’ goals within those programs.Materials and Methods:As part of our regular program review process, the fellows evaluated the value and effectiveness of our existing fellowship tracks (Research Informatics, Clinical Two-year Focused Informatics, Clinical One-year Focused Informatics, and Clinical 1 + 1 Subspecialty Pathology and Informatics). They compared their education, informatics background, and anticipated career paths and analyzed them for correlations between those parameters and the fellowship track chosen. All current and past fellows of the program were actively involved with the project.Results:Fellows’ anticipated career paths correlated very well with the specific tracks in the program. A small set of fellows (Clinical – one or two year – Focused Informatics tracks) anticipated clinical careers primarily focused in informatics (Director of Informatics). The majority of the fellows, however, anticipated a career practicing in a Pathology subspecialty, using their informatics training to enhance that practice (Clinical 1 + 1 Subspecialty Pathology and Informatics Track). Significantly, all fellows on this track reported they would not have considered a Clinical Two-year Focused Informatics track if it was the only track offered. The Research and the Clinical One-year Focused Informatics tracks each displayed unique value for different situations.Conclusions:It seems a “one size fits all” fellowship structure does not fit the needs of the majority of potential Pathology Informatics candidates. Increasingly, these fellowships must be able to accommodate the needs of candidates anticipating a wide range of Pathology Informatics career paths, be able to accommodate Pathology's increasingly subspecialized structure, and do this in a way that respects the multiple fellowships needed to become a subspecialty pathologist and informatician. This is further complicated as Pathology Informatics begins to look outward and takes its place in the growing, and still ill-defined, field of Clinical Informatics, a field that is not confined to just one medical specialty, to one way of practicing medicine, or to one way of providing patient care.
机译：背景：病理学信息学是一个新兴领域。即使在开始正式化，认证和董事会认证过程时仍在定义自己的领域。同时，病理学本身正在以各种影响信息学的方式发生变化，包括子专业化和数据分析的增加使用。在本文中，我们研究了这些变化如何影响病理学信息学研究金计划的结构以及这些计划中研究人员的目标。材料和方法：作为我们常规计划审查过程的一部分，研究人员评估了我们现有研究计划的价值和有效性研究金（研究信息学，临床两年制重点信息学，临床一年制重点信息学和临床1 +1亚专业病理学和信息学）。他们比较了他们的学历，信息学背景和预期的职业道路，并分析了这些参数与所选择的研究金路径之间的相关性。该计划的所有现任和过去的研究人员都积极参与了该项目。结果：研究员的预期职业发展道路与该计划的特定轨道非常相关。一小部分研究人员（临床-两年或两年-重点信息学专业）预计主要从事信息学的临床职业（信息学总监）。但是，大多数研究人员都期望通过病理学亚专业进行职业生涯，并通过他们的信息学培训来加强这种实践（临床1 + 1亚专业病理学和信息学专业）。值得注意的是，该学科的所有同僚都报告说，如果这是唯一提供的学科，则不会考虑临床两年重点信息学学科。该研究和为期一年的《临床信息学》重点研究了每种药物在不同情况下的独特价值。结论：似乎“一刀切”的奖学金结构并不适合大多数潜在病理学信息学候选人的需求。这些研究金必须越来越能够满足预期广泛的病理学信息学职业道路的应聘者的需求，能够适应病理学日趋专业化的结构，并且在做到这一点时要尊重成为亚专业病理学专家所需要的多个研究金。情报员。随着病理学信息学开始向外看，并在发展中，但仍不确定的临床信息学领域中占据一席之地，该领域不仅限于一个医学专业，一种行医方法，或者一种提供病人护理的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号