...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Power and Energy Engineering >The Analysis of the Differences between Electromechanical Transients Simulation and Electromagnetic Transients Simulation
【24h】

The Analysis of the Differences between Electromechanical Transients Simulation and Electromagnetic Transients Simulation

机译:机电暂态仿真与电磁暂态仿真差异的分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The paper firstly interprets the differences between electromechanical transients program BPA and electromagnetic transients program EMTDC in the field of principle, model and algorithm. Then the authors carry out the simulation based on single-machine infinite-bus system and draw some conclusions. The time consumption of the simulation using EMTDC is much longer than the simulation using BPA under the same length of time. The results of BPA are close to those of EMTDC under steady conditions. The fundamental frequency component of the EMTDC results seems closer to the BPA results than its original value, but they still away from completely consistent. In this simulation of single-machine infinite-bus system, the transient stability results of BPA and EMTDC are close, but the results of BPA are apt to be more conservative. All the conclusions above have a certain reference value to both hybrid simulation and comprehensive analysis method in the study of the AC/DC digital simulation of large power grid.
机译:本文首先从原理,模型和算法的角度解释了机电暂态程序BPA和电磁暂态程序EMMTC的区别。然后作者进行了基于单机无限总线系统的仿真,并得出了一些结论。在相同的时间长度下,使用EMTDC进行模拟的时间消耗要比使用BPA进行模拟的时间长得多。在稳定条件下,BPA的结果接近EMTDC的结果。 EMTDC结果的基本频率成分似乎比BPA结果更接近其原始值,但仍与完全一致的结果相去甚远。在单机无限总线系统的仿真中,BPA和EMTDC的瞬态稳定性结果接近,但BPA的结果倾向于更保守。以上所有结论对于大电网交直流数字仿真研究中的混合仿真和综合分析方法均具有一定的参考价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号