...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Medicine >A cohort study on elderly individuals newly certified as requiring long-term care: comparison of rates of care-needs certifications between basic checklist respondents/specific health examinees and non-respondentson-examinees of 37,000 elderlies in a city
【24h】

A cohort study on elderly individuals newly certified as requiring long-term care: comparison of rates of care-needs certifications between basic checklist respondents/specific health examinees and non-respondentson-examinees of 37,000 elderlies in a city

机译：一项针对新近认证需要长期护理的老年人的队列研究：城市中37,000名基本检查表受访者/特定健康检查者与未答复者/未检查者之间的护理需求认证率比较

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objective: The rates of care-needs certification were mainly compared between two cohorts: 7,820 specific health checkup examinees/basic checklist respondents and 29,234 non-examineeson-respondents. Subjects and Methods: Among approximately 37,000 elderly citizens of X City, the number of individuals newly certified as requiring long-term care were observed from the date of the first specific health checkup in 2008 to March 31, 2013. The aggregated totals of these individuals and associated factors were evaluated. Results: 1. Support Required 1, Support Required 2, and Long-term Care Required (level 1) certified individuals accounted for approximately 80% of newly certified individuals aged 65–74 years. Newly certified individuals aged 75 years and over had similar results with 37.2% of them being certified Support Required 1, 19.4% certified Support Required 2, and 22.9% certified Long-term Care Required (level 1). 2. The primary factors for care-needs certification in individuals aged 65–74 years were arthritic disorder in 27.6%, falls and bone fractures in 11.3%, and malignant neoplasm and cerebrovascular disease, among others. This was similar for individuals aged 75 years or over. 3. Of the 7,820 specific health checkup examinees/basic checklist respondents, 1,280 were newly certified as requiring long-term care (16.4%) compared to 7,878 (26.9%) of the 29,234 non-examineeson-respondents. Therefore, the latter cohort had a significantly higher rate of individuals who were newly certified as requiring long-term care. Conclusion: Both specific health checkups and basic checklists are effective health policies to protect frailty in community elderlies.
机译：目的：主要在两个队列中比较了护理需求认证的比率：7820名特定的健康检查应试者/基本检查表受访者和29234名未检查者/未受访者。受试者和方法：从X城从2008年首次特定健康检查之日起至2013年3月31日，观察了X市约37,000名老年人，并获得了新认证的需要长期护理的人数。并评估相关因素。结果：1.需要支持的人员1，需要支持的人员2和需要长期护理（1级）的认证人员约占年龄介于65-74岁的新认证人员的80％。 75岁及75岁以上的新认证个人具有相似的结果，其中37.2％的人需要认证的支持1、19.4％的认证需要的支持2和22.9％的认证的长期护理（1级）。 2. 65-74岁的个人获得护理需求认证的主要因素是关节炎疾病（占27.6％），跌倒和骨折（占11.3％）以及恶性肿瘤和脑血管疾病等。对于75岁或75岁以上的人来说，情况相似。 3.在7,820名特定的健康检查被检查者/基本检查清单应答者中，有1,280名新认证为需要长期护理（16.4％），而29,234名未检查者/未应答者中有7878名（26.9％）。因此，后一个队列的人中新近被证明需要长期护理的人数要高得多。结论：特定的健康检查和基本检查表都是有效的健康政策，可以保护社区老年人的身体虚弱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号