• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sports Medicine >Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Tuck Jump Assessment by Health Professionals of Varied Educational Backgrounds
【24h】

Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Tuck Jump Assessment by Health Professionals of Varied Educational Backgrounds

机译：教育背景各异的卫生专业人员进行Jump跳评估的等级间和等级内可靠性

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objective. The Tuck Jump Assessment (TJA), a clinical plyometric assessment, identifies 10 jumping and landing technique flaws. The study objective was to investigate TJA interrater and intrarater reliability with raters of different educational and clinical backgrounds. Methods. 40 participants were video recorded performing the TJA using published protocol and instructions. Five raters of varied educational and clinical backgrounds scored the TJA. Each score of the 10 technique flaws was summed for the total TJA score. Approximately one month later, 3 raters scored the videos again. Intraclass correlation coefficients determined interrater (5 and 3 raters for first and second session, resp.) and intrarater (3 raters) reliability. Results. Interrater reliability with 5 raters was poor (ICC = 0.47; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.33–0.62). Interrater reliability between 3 raters who completed 2 scoring sessions improved from 0.52 (95% CI 0.35–0.68) for session one to 0.69 (95% CI 0.55–0.81) for session two. Intrarater reliability was poor to moderate, ranging from 0.44 (95% CI 0.22–0.68) to 0.72 (95% CI 0.55–0.84). Conclusion. Published protocol and training of raters were insufficient to allow consistent TJA scoring. There may be a learned effect with the TJA since interrater reliability improved with repetition. TJA instructions and training should be modified and enhanced before clinical implementation.
机译：目的。 Tuck Jump评估（TJA）是一项临床测温评估，可识别10个跳跃和着陆技术缺陷。本研究的目的是研究具有不同教育和临床背景的评估者的TJA跨度和评估者内部可靠性。方法。使用公开的协议和说明对40名参与者进行了TJA录像。五个具有不同教育和临床背景的评估者对TJA进行了评分。将10个技术缺陷的每个得分相加，得出总的TJA得分。大约一个月后，3位评分者再次对视频进行了评分。类内相关系数确定了指标间（分别为第一和第二阶段的5个和3个评价者）和内部评价者（3个评价者）的可靠性。结果。 5名评分者的评分者间信度很差（ICC = 0.47; 95％置信区间（CI）0.33–0.62）。在完成2个评分会话的3个评分者之间的评分者间信度从第一部分的0.52（95％CI 0.35–0.68）提高到第二部分的0.69（95％CI 0.55–0.81）。评估者内部的信度差到中等，范围从0.44（95％CI 0.22-0.68）到0.72（95％CI 0.55-0.84）。结论。已发布的协议和评估者的培训不足以使TJA评分保持一致。 TJA可能会产生一定的学习效果，因为重复性会提高间隔可靠性。在临床实施之前，应修改和加强TJA的说明和培训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号