首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sustainable Development >The Debate about Methods of Using the Laboratory Plan (Dalton Plan) During History and Social Studies Classes in the “Istorik-Marxist” Journal in 1927
【24h】

The Debate about Methods of Using the Laboratory Plan (Dalton Plan) During History and Social Studies Classes in the “Istorik-Marxist” Journal in 1927

机译:关于1927年“伊斯托里克-马克思主义”杂志历史和社会研究课上使用实验室计划(道尔顿计划)方法的争论

获取原文
           

摘要

The importance of the problem investigated is caused by modern trends in the Russian educational system which aims to seek new teaching methods for various disciplines including historical ones. The reference to debates about teaching methods in History and Social Studies in the second half of 1920s allows to make a practical use of the ideas that were never realized because the unified Soviet educational system was established in 1930s. The purpose of the article is in investigation of the debate that took place in 1927 in “Istorik-Marxist” journal, as well as the analysis of the main problems that arise in the process of using the Dalton Plan and ways of their solution. The leading approaches to investigating the problem given are the comparative-historical method and the essential-substantional analysis. The article shows in retrospect the condition of teaching historical and public disciplines in the Soviet system of education, examines the process of the debate about methods of using the Dalton Plan in the “Istorik-Marxist” journal, reveals certain complications that teachers of the second half of 1920s faced and offers the ideas of their solution. The ideas of the article can be useful for researchers in the field of education history, varieties of pragmatic methods use while teaching the Humanities, the USSR public opinion in the second half of 1920s.
机译:所研究问题的重要性是由俄罗斯教育体系的现代趋势引起的,该趋势旨在为包括历史学科在内的各种学科寻求新的教学方法。引用1920年代后半期有关历史和社会学教学方法的辩论,可以实际利用由于1930年代建立了统一的苏联教育体系而从未实现的思想。本文的目的是调查1927年在“伊斯托里克-马克思主义”杂志上进行的辩论,并对使用道尔顿计划过程中出现的主要问题及其解决方法进行分析。调查所给问题的主要方法是比较历史方法和本质实质分析。文章回顾了苏联教育体系中历史和公共学科教学的情况,回顾了《伊斯托里克-马克思主义》杂志中有关使用道尔顿计划的方法的辩论过程,揭示了第二种教师的某些复杂性1920年代的一半面临并提出了解决方案的想法。本文的思想对于教育历史领域的研究人员,1920年代后半叶在教授人文学科,苏联舆论时使用的各种实用方法可能有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号