• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry >Government Monitoring of the Mental Health of Children in Canada: Five Surveys (Part I)
【24h】

Government Monitoring of the Mental Health of Children in Canada: Five Surveys (Part I)

机译：政府对加拿大儿童心理健康的监测：五项调查（第一部分）

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objective Canadian governments spend billions of dollars yearly on programmatic interventions, intended to improve the mental health of children, without recommended monitoring of children’s mental health. The Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry monitored governments’ progress in producing reports. Method Five evolving surveys were done during 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2008. Initially, progress was monitored then later surveys examined challenges that inhibited monitoring, the need for a national strategy, an indicator framework and an agency to do the monitoring and the role of non-government organizations. The 2008 survey requested the three most important indicators governments desired, and created clarity in the definition of monitoring reports in contents, criteria, qualities of indicators and potential names. For comparison purposes, a Partnership Model to survey populations was evaluated. Results Over five surveys, 13 of 14 governments affirmed the desire for monitoring and 64 publications were reviewed and categorized. No reports met criteria for ‘monitoring reports’. The Partnership Model was used successfully in 11 Provincial-Territorial governments. Conclusions It was reassuring that governments supported monitoring and were producing reports. The Partnership Model may offer a suitable alternative for governments. Results of 2006 and 2008, discussion, conclusions and references are in Part II.
机译：目标加拿大政府每年花费数十亿美元用于方案干预措施，目的是改善儿童的心理健康，而未建议对儿童的心理健康进行监测。加拿大儿童和青少年精神病学会监视了政府在编制报告方面的进展。方法在2002年，2004年，2005年，2006年和2008年进行了五项不断发展的调查。最初对进展情况进行了监测，后来的调查研究了阻碍监测的挑战，制定国家战略，指标框架和机构进行监测的必要性以及非政府组织的作用。 2008年的调查要求政府希望获得三个最重要的指标，并在定义内容，标准，指标的质量和潜在名称方面明确了监测报告的定义。为了进行比较，评估了调查人口的伙伴关系模型。结果在五项调查中，有14个政府中的13个确认了监测的愿望，并对64种出版物进行了审查和分类。没有任何报告符合“监视报告”的标准。伙伴关系模型已在11个省/地区政府中成功使用。结论令人放心的是，政府支持监控并制作报告。伙伴关系模型可以为政府提供合适的替代方案。第二部分是2006和2008年的结果，讨论，结论和参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号