...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >The race against the 'septic shark'
【24h】

The race against the 'septic shark'

机译:与“化脓性鲨鱼”的比赛

获取原文
           

摘要

Great white sharks are responsible for about 10 cases of death annually worldwide, as compared with millions of deaths caused by sepsis. However, the basic principles of avoiding shark attacks and fighting sepsis seem to be similar: avoidance, attention, and speed, if necessary. The present review discusses the current status of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, which are actually content for discussion because of their low specificity. Current data suggest that one in eight patients with severe sepsis does not fulfill the SIRS criteria and is consequently missed, and therefore the calls for new definitions of sepsis are getting louder. Furthermore, the need for early treatment of sepsis and fast admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) with experienced stuff is reviewed as well as the early and appropriate initiation of therapy, namely antibiotic and volume therapy. A key feature is the analysis of the studies from the so-called "Sepsis Trilogy" (ProCESS, ARISE, and ProMiSe studies), with a focus on the status of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT). The authors of the "Sepsis Trilogy" concluded that there is no benefit regarding survival in septic patients by using EGDT as compared with standard therapy. However, the low mortality of the control groups within the "Sepsis Trilogy" studies as compared with the Rivers et al. study from 2001 leads to the conclusion that there has been an improvement in the therapy of septic patients, most probably due to the early initiation of therapy as a kind of "standard" in sepsis therapy. Finally, the phenomenon of a "large trial disease" is discussed, exemplary in a trial which investigated the maintenance of the "right" mean arterial pressure in sepsis patients. Even if the result of a large randomized trial might be that there is no difference between two study groups, the real exercise is to identify the patient collectives who might benefit or experience harm due to an intervention. In summary, as compared with swimming in dangerous waters, high attention is needed in handling septic patients. Once an attack has occurred, speed is of utmost importance (i.e., initiation of therapy and admission to the ICU) because it appears logical that time is critical in septic patients This may have resulted in the implementation of early (goal-directed) treatment as a "standard" in the treatment of sepsis with significant improvement in survival.
机译:在世界范围内,大白鲨每年造成约10例死亡,而败血症导致的数百万例死亡。但是,避免鲨鱼袭击和对抗败血症的基本原则似乎是相似的:如有必要,避免,注意和速度。本综述讨论了系统性炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准的现状,由于其特异性低,实际上值得讨论。当前数据表明,严重脓毒症的患者中有八分之一不符合SIRS标准,因此被遗漏了,因此对脓毒症新定义的呼声越来越高。此外,审查了败血症的早期治疗和使用经验丰富的药物快速进入重症监护病房(ICU)的需要,以及早期和适当开始治疗的需求,即抗生素和批量治疗。一个关键功能是对所谓的“脓毒症三部曲”(ProCESS,ARISE和ProMiSe研究)的研究进行分析,重点关注早期目标导向疗法(EGDT)的状态。 《败血症三部曲》的作者得出结论,与标准疗法相比,使用EGDT对败血症患者的生存没有益处。但是,与“ Rivers等”相比,“败血症三部曲”研究中对照组的死亡率较低。 2001年的一项研究得出的结论是,败血病患者的治疗有所改善,这很可能归因于脓毒症治疗的一种“标准”疗法的早期启动。最后,讨论了“大试验疾病”的现象,在一项研究败血症患者“右”平均动脉压维持情况的试验中为例。即使大型随机试验的结果可能是两个研究组之间没有差异,真正的练习还是要确定可能因干预而受益或遭受伤害的患者群体。总之,与在危险水中游泳相比,在处理败血病患者时需要高度重视。一旦发生发作,速度是最重要的(即开始治疗并进入ICU),因为在脓毒症患者中时间很关键似乎合乎逻辑。这可能导致实施早期(目标导向)治疗,因为败血症治疗的“标准”,可显着提高生存率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号