A Comparative Study of Network Modeling Using A Relational Database(E.G. Oracle, Mysql, SQL Server) Vs. Neo4j.

Ceyhun Ozgur; Jeffrey Coto; David Booth

首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications >A Comparative Study of Network Modeling Using A Relational Database(E.G. Oracle, Mysql, SQL Server) Vs. Neo4j.

【24h】

A Comparative Study of Network Modeling Using A Relational Database(E.G. Oracle, Mysql, SQL Server) Vs. Neo4j.

机译：使用关系数据库（例如Oracle，Mysql，SQL Server）的网络建模的比较研究。 Neo4j。

获取原文

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

According to Mansaf andKashish (2016), big data growth is very high. It is very difficult to manage due to various characteristics, which is why Hadoop and neo4j are both critical to using large datasets and applying knowledge from them to real-world scenarios. Hadoop was developed from Google's techniques in analyzing large datasets whereas neo4j is graphical software. There are two basic functions when using Hadoop. These functions are how the program stores files and how the program processes data. Hadoop is capable of storing files larger than the disk space available on a single node in a network or server and.........

机译：根据Mansaf和Kashish（2016），大数据增长非常快。由于各种特性，管理起来非常困难，这就是Hadoop和neo4j都对于使用大型数据集并将其知识应用于实际场景至关重要的原因。 Hadoop是由Google用于分析大型数据集的技术开发的，而neo4j是图形软件。使用Hadoop时有两个基本功能。这些功能是程序如何存储文件以及程序如何处理数据。 Hadoop能够存储大于网络或服务器中单个节点上可用磁盘空间的文件，并且.........

著录项

来源
《International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications》 |2018年第7期|共页
作者
Ceyhun Ozgur; Jeffrey Coto; David Booth;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类工业技术;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Lifescience Global :: Abstract : Huge and Real-Time Database Systems: A Comparative Study and Review for SQL Server 2016, Oracle 12c & MySQL 5.7 for Personal Computer [J] . Huge, Real-Time Database Systems: A Comparative Study, Review for SQL Server 2016, Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences . 2017,第6期

机译：Lifescience Global ::摘要：大型实时数据库系统：SQL Server 2016，Oracle 12c和MySQL 5.7个人计算机的比较研究和评论
2. Comparative Study Between the MySQL Relational Database and the MongoDB NoSQL Database [J] . Karim Bouamrane, Houcine Matallah, Ghalem Belalem International journal of software science and computational intelligence . 2021,第3期

机译：MySQL关系数据库与MongoDB NoSQL数据库之间的比较研究
3. Analysis and Neural Networks Modeling of Web Server Performances Using MySQL and PostgreSQL [J] . Fontaine Rafamantanantsoa, Maherindefo Laha Communications and Network . 2018,第4期

机译：使用MySQL和PostgreSQL的Web服务器性能分析和神经网络建模
4. A comparative study: MongoDB vs. MySQL [C] . Gyorodi Cornelia, Gyorodi Robert, Pecherle George, International Conference on Engineering of Modern Electric Systems . 2015

机译：比较研究：MongoDB与MySQL
5. Performance tuning of large Oracle(RTM) database systems: A study of performance tuning concepts and strategies for large Oracle database systems on UNIX platforms. [D] . Dokka, Ramabhadra R. 1998

机译：大型Oracle（RTM）数据库系统的性能调优：针对UNIX平台上的大型Oracle数据库系统的性能调优概念和策略的研究。
6. Executing Complexity-Increasing Queries in Relational (MySQL) and NoSQL (MongoDB and EXist) Size-Growing ISO/EN 13606 Standardized EHR Databases [O] . Ricardo Sánchez-de-Madariaga, Adolfo Muñoz, Antonio L Castro, 2018

机译：在关系型（MySQL）和NoSQL型（MongoDB和EXist）增长大小的ISO / EN 13606标准化EHR数据库中执行增加复杂性的查询
7. Comparative Performance Analysis of MySQL and SQL Server Relational Database Management Systems in Windows Environment [O] . Amlanjyoti Saikia, Sherin Joy, Dhondup Dolma, 2015

机译：Windows环境中MySQL和SQL Server关系数据库管理系统的比较绩效分析

A Comparative Study of Network Modeling Using A Relational Database(E.G. Oracle, Mysql, SQL Server) Vs. Neo4j.

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅