...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Cultural Differences in Answerability Judgments
【24h】

Cultural Differences in Answerability Judgments

机译:责任感判断中的文化差异

获取原文
           

摘要

Judgments about whether anyone can provide a relevant and correct answer to a question are called answerability judgments. Such judgements can be important in societal planning and decision making and may vary in different cultural contexts. Six hundred participants in each of China, India, and Sweden made answerability judgments of six difficult knowledge questions. For each question, they choose between three options indicating that they thought the question was answerable and a fourth option: “Nobody can answer that question.” After each question, they rated their confidence that their judgment was correct. Choosing “Nobody can answer that question” was significantly more common for the Swedes and was uncommon in the Asian samples. The Asian samples showed higher confidence in their judgments. We suggest that these differences may be explained by results from cross-cultural research, but this study did not investigate specific mechanisms. Hence, more research is needed.
机译:关于是否有人可以提供有关问题的正确答案的判断称为可回答性判断。这样的判断在社会规划和决策中可能很重要,并且在不同的文化背景下可能会有所不同。中国,印度和瑞典的六百名参与者对六个困难知识问题做出了可回答性判断。对于每个问题,他们在表示自己认为该问题可以回答的三个选项和一个“没人可以回答该问题”的选项之间进行选择。在每个问题之后,他们都对自己的判断是正确的表示了信心。选择“没人能回答这个问题”在瑞典人中更为普遍,在亚洲样本中很少见。亚洲样本对他们的判断显示出更高的信心。我们建议,这些差异可能是由跨文化研究的结果所解释,但本研究并未研究具体机制。因此,需要更多的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号