...
【24h】

MORE DEBATE AND MORE EVIDENCE NEEDED

机译:需要更多辩论和更多证据

获取原文
           

摘要

Taking decisions about life sustaining treatment can be stressful for health professionals, whose training may have included little if any clinical ethics and health care law. House officers and nurses are often reported to be confused about what sort of care should be provided, and doctors' and patients' views of whether or not the patient should be resuscitated may conflict.In view of our medical conservatism perhaps we need a wider debate about life sustaining protocols. Taking part should be not only actual and potential patients but also the many groups who staff hospitals. One difficulty is the lack of research into the processes and effects of life sustaining treatment and its withdrawal on all concerned. If institutional protocols catch on they should be evaluated even if they seem obviously beneficial.
机译:对维持生命的治疗做出决定可能对卫生专业人员造成压力,他们的培训可能几乎没有临床道德和卫生保健法。据报道,内务干部和护士通常对应该提供哪种护理感到困惑,医生和患者对患者是否应该复苏的看法可能会发生冲突。鉴于我们的医疗保守主义,也许我们需要进行更广泛的辩论关于维持生命的协议。参与的不仅应该是实际的和潜在的患者,还应该包括许多为医院配备人员的团体。一个困难是缺乏对维持生命治疗的过程和效果及其对所有有关方面的撤消的研究。如果制度性规章制度很受欢迎,即使它们看起来显然是有益的,也应该对其进行评估。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号