...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >The Biobehavioral Interface in Behavioral Pediatrics
【24h】

The Biobehavioral Interface in Behavioral Pediatrics

机译:行为儿科的生物行为界面

获取原文
           

摘要

Behavioral pediatrics begins, as a discipline, with at least two important assumptions: (1) that all human experiences have psychosocial as well as biological or organic contexts; and (2) that the biological substrate with which the child is born is modifiable. Thus, behavioral pediatrics, by its own definitions and assumptions, initiates research questions at the biobehavioral interface.1 This paper attempts to delineate a number of research directions that may be used to investigate the complex relationships between behavioral and biological factors in behavioral pediatrics.Research investigating biobehavioral processes can be approached on a number of different levels. The research can be organized in terms of the following specific causal assumptions relating behavioral and biological factors: (1) a parallel model; (2) a causal model in which behavioral factors influence biological factors; (3) a causal model in which biological factors determine behavior; and (4) a causal model in which there is bidirectional causality.1. Parallels Between Behavior and Biology. This model assumes that there is no directional causality. Behavioral and biological factors represent parallel systems sharing a common underlying organization. Behavioral and physiological variables may be viewed as different levels of the same system, mediated by central nervous system processes. Various screening methods are based on this model. Research questions dealing with this model focus on indexing and predicting developmental outcome. Techniques such as the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale2 or the identification of sleep patterns3 evaluate behavioral patterns and attempt to identify neurophysiological or neurological dysfunction. Similarly, physiological response patterns such as infant cry patterns4 or heart rate variability measures such as cardiac vagal tone5 have been used to predict developmental outcome when the behavioral repertoire is too limited to be useful in predicting subsequent behavior.
机译:作为一门学科,行为儿科至少要有两个重要的假设:(1)所有人类经历都具有社会心理,生物学或有机环境; (2)该孩子出生的生物学底物是可修改的。因此,行为儿科根据其自身的定义和假设,在生物行为界面上引发了研究问题。1本文试图描述许多研究方向,这些研究方向可用于研究行为儿科中行为和生物学因素之间的复杂关系。调查生物行为过程可以在许多不同的层次上进行。可以根据以下有关行为和生物学因素的特定因果假设来组织研究:(1)并行模型; (2)行为因素影响生物学因素的因果模型; (3)因果模型,其中生物学因素决定行为; (4)存在双向因果关系的因果模型。行为与生物学之间的平行。该模型假定没有方向因果关系。行为和生物学因素代表了共享一个共同的基础组织的并行系统。行为和生理变量可以被视为同一系统的不同水平,由中枢神经系统过程介导。各种筛选方法均基于此模型。有关该模型的研究问题集中在索引和预测发育结果。诸如新生儿行为评估量表2或识别睡眠模式3之类的技术可评估行为模式并尝试识别神经生理或神经功能障碍。类似地,当行为库太有限而无法用于预测后续行为时,生理反应模式(如婴儿啼哭模式)或心率变异性度量(如心脏迷走神经色调)已被用于预测发育结果。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号