...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Children in Car Crashes: Analysis of Data for Injury and Use of Restraints
【24h】

Children in Car Crashes: Analysis of Data for Injury and Use of Restraints

机译:发生车祸的儿童:伤害数据和约束使用数据分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective. To determine the effect of car restraints on motor vehicle injury rates for children aged 0 to 14 years.Methods. A probability sample of all police-reported car crashes in the United States in 1990 and 1991 was analyzed for injury rates of passengers aged less than 15 years in relation to restraint usage, age, and seating position.Results. Optimal restraint usage (defined as car seats for children 0 to 4 years old and lap shoulder belts for children 5 to 14 years old) was 40%. The use of the car seat was 76% for infants (0 to 12 months old) and 41% for toddlers (1 to 4 year olds). The non use of a restraint was highest for 10 to 14 year olds (43%).The rate of involvement in car crashes for all children was 21.4 (per 1000/yr). The highest rate was the 14 year olds with 29.6 followed by 2 year olds with 26.5.Injury rates were 4.76 (per 1000/yr) for all children. The lowest rate was 2.91 for infants but increased to 4.78 for 3 year olds. The single strongest risk factor for injury was the non use of a restraint. (Adjusted odds ratio 2.7; 95% CI 2.4 to 3.0.) The risk factor for injury for the front seat was 1.5 (95% CI 1.4 to 1.7).Use of the car seat reduced injuries by 60% for 0 to 4 year olds, whereas the lap shoulder harness was only 38% effective for 5 to 14 year olds ( P ≤ .001) Injury rates of unrestrained 0 to 4 and 5 to 14 year olds were similar.Conclusions. Greater involvement in car crashes and less use of car restraints explains the 64% higher rate of injury for 3 year olds than for infants. It is time to target the toddlers.Restraints designed for adults are not as effective for the school age child as car seats are for the preschool child. A better restraint for the school age child should be designed and evaluated. Meanwhile, increased usage of current restraints must be encouraged, as they substantially reduce injuries.
机译:目的。确定汽车约束对0至14岁儿童的汽车伤害率的影响。方法。对1990年和1991年美国警方报告的所有车祸的概率样本进行了分析,分析了15岁以下的乘客受伤的发生率与约束使用方式,年龄和座位位置有关的结果。最佳约束使用率(定义为0至4岁儿童的汽车座椅和5至14岁儿童的腰部安全带)为40%。婴儿(0至12个月大)的汽车安全座椅使用率为76%,幼儿(1至4岁)的汽车安全座椅使用率为41%。 10至14岁的儿童不使用约束装置的比例最高(43%),所有儿童发生车祸的比例为21.4(每1000年/年)。患病率最高的是14岁的29.6岁儿童,其次是2岁的26.5岁儿童,所有儿童的伤害率为4.76(每1000岁/年)。婴儿的最低比率为2.91,但3岁儿童的比率最高为4.78。受伤的最强风险因素是不使用约束装置。 (调整后的优势比为2.7; 95%CI为2.4至3.0。)前排座椅受伤的危险因素为1.5(95%CI为1.4至1.7)。使用汽车座椅可使0至4岁的儿童受伤减少60%。 ,而腰部肩带对5至14岁的儿童只有38%有效(P≤.001),不受约束的0至4岁和5至14岁儿童的伤害率相似。 3岁以下儿童更多地参与车祸并且较少使用汽车约束器,这说明婴儿的受伤率比婴儿高64%。现在是针对幼儿的时候了。针对成人设计的约束对于学龄儿童而言不如对学龄前儿童的汽车座椅有效。应该设计和评估对学龄儿童的更好约束。同时,必须鼓励增加电流限制器的使用,因为它们可以大大减少伤害。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号