...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Type of Day-Care Setting and Risk of Repeated Infections
【24h】

Type of Day-Care Setting and Risk of Repeated Infections

机译:日托类型和重复感染的风险

获取原文
           

摘要

As a direct result of demographic and sociologic changes, increasing numbers of children are attending day care in all industrialized countries. Unfortunately, the close physical contact among children in day care favors the transmission of infectious diseases. Previous studies have focused mainly on the risk of upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and otitis media, which are reported to occur two to three times more frequently in children attending day care centers than in those cared for at home.1-7 Similarly day-care attendance has been found to be associated with an increased risk of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI),8 gastroenteritis,9 as well as with the dissemination of infections caused by hepatitis A,10 cytomegalovirus,11 and H. influenzae type b.12Despite convincing evidence for a higher risk of infection in day-care centers, most parents do not have an acceptable alternative to day care. It may be more useful, therefore, to identify the types of day-care structures associated with lower infectious risks. Family day care, in which several children are cared for in another family setting, offers a viable alternative to group day care, but previous studies have provided conflicting information on the risk of respiratory infections and otitis media in this setting. In four studies, the risks observed in family day care were very close to those of children who remained at home3-5,8; in two, they were intermediate between the risks at home and those in formal day-care centers6,7; while in two others, they were very close to those in day-care centers.13 These conflicting results can be explained by several factors including the lack of strict definitions for the different types of day-care settings and failure to control for the potentially important confounding differences in the number of children attending each type, the age range (from 2 to 60 months), and the time per week spent in the setting.
机译:由于人口和社会学变化的直接结果,所有工业化国家中越来越多的儿童正在接受日托。不幸的是,儿童在日托中的密切身体接触有利于传染病的传播。以前的研究主要集中在上呼吸道感染(URTI)和中耳炎的风险上,据报道,在日托中心就诊的儿童中,上呼吸道感染和中耳炎的发生频率是在家中的2到3倍。1-7护理人员的出勤与下呼吸道感染(LRTI),8胃肠炎9的风险增加以及甲型肝炎10巨细胞病毒11和b型流感嗜血杆菌引起的感染传播有关。 12尽管有令人信服的证据表明,日托中心的感染风险更高,但大多数父母没有替代日托的可接受方法。因此,确定与较低感染风险相关的日托结构的类型可能更有用。家庭日托是在集体日托中的一种可行的替代选择,其中有几个孩子在另一家庭环境中得到照料,但是以前的研究提供了有关在这种环境下呼吸道感染和中耳炎风险的相互矛盾的信息。在四项研究中,在家庭日托中观察到的风险与留在家中的儿童的风险非常接近[3-5,8]。在两个国家中,这些风险介于家庭风险和正规日托中心的风险之间6,7;而另外两个则与日托中心非常接近。13这些矛盾的结果可以由几个因素来解释,其中包括对不同类型的日托环境缺乏严格的定义以及无法控制潜在的重要因素。混淆了每种类型的儿童人数,年龄范围(2到60个月)以及每周在该环境中度过的时间的差异。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号