...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Do Missed Opportunities Stay Missed? A 6-Month Follow-up of Missed Vaccine Opportunities in Inner City Milwaukee Children
【24h】

Do Missed Opportunities Stay Missed? A 6-Month Follow-up of Missed Vaccine Opportunities in Inner City Milwaukee Children

机译:错过的机会会留下来吗?密尔沃基市内儿童错过疫苗机会的6个月随访

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives. To determine 1) the frequency of missed vaccine opportunities (VOs) in inner city children ≤3 years of age; 2) whether the recommended vaccine(s) were given within 6 months of the missed opportunity (MO); 3) whether these vaccinations were age-appropriate according to the guidelines of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices; and 4) variables associated with MOs.Design. ?Retrospective chart review with a nested retrospective cohort of children with MOs.Setting. ?Two inner city practice settings in Milwaukee: a community health center and an academic continuity care practice.Patients/Selection Procedure. ?A consecutive sample of 710 visits of inner city children ≤3 years of age with VOs, seen between January 1 and March 31, 1995. A VO was defined as any encounter when the child was vaccine-eligible according to Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices guidelines.Results. ?MOs occurred in 47% (330/710) of the VOs. Only 40% of the children with MOs received age-appropriate immunizations within 6 months; 30% received the vaccinations beyond the age-appropriate time. The remaining 30% either did not return or were not vaccinated on return. The variables significantly associated with MOs were 1) age: children with MOs were older than those without, with a mean age of 15.5 months vs 10.9 months; 2) minor febrile illness; 3) moderate/severe illness; 4) acute illness encounters; and 5) patient's being seen at the community health center. Only 15.5% of all MOs were justified by the presence of moderate/severe illness.Conclusions. ?VOs are frequently missed in inner city children. Most of the MOs were not justified by the valid contraindication of moderate/severe illness. Sixty percent of the children with MOs did not receive age-appropriate immunizations within 6 months. These children are vulnerable to vaccine-preventable diseases such as measles and pertussis.
机译:目标。确定1)≤3岁的内城儿童错过疫苗机会(VOs)的频率; 2)是否在错过的机会(MO)的6个月内给予了推荐的疫苗; 3)根据疫苗接种实践咨询委员会的指导原则,这些疫苗是否适合年龄;和4)与MOs.Design相关的变量。回顾性图表回顾,回顾了一组MOs.Setting儿童的嵌套回顾性队列。密尔沃基的两个城市内部实践场所:社区卫生中心和学术连续性护理实践。患者/选择程序。在1995年1月1日至3月31日期间,连续抽取710例3岁以下的内城区儿童进行VO访视。根据免疫实践咨询委员会的定义,VO是指儿童符合疫苗资格时的任何遭遇。准则。结果。在47%(330/710)的VO中发生了MO。在六个月内,只有40%的MO患儿接受了适合年龄的免疫接种; 30%的人超过了适合年龄的时间接种了疫苗。其余的30%要么没有返回,要么没有返回接种疫苗。与MOs显着相关的变量是1)年龄:患有MOs的孩子比没有MOs的孩子大,平均年龄为15.5个月vs 10.9个月; 2)轻微的高热病; 3)中度/重度疾病; 4)遇到急性疾病; 5)在社区卫生中心看病人。在所有MO中,只有15.5%的人认为存在中度/重度疾病是合理的。在城市内的孩子中经常会错过VOs。大多数MO均没有中度/重度疾病的有效禁忌证。 60%的MO患儿在6个月内未接受适合年龄的免疫接种。这些儿童容易受到疫苗可预防的疾病的影响,例如麻疹和百日咳。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号