...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >The Use of Physician Financial Incentives and Feedback to Improve Pediatric Preventive Care in Medicaid Managed Care
【24h】

The Use of Physician Financial Incentives and Feedback to Improve Pediatric Preventive Care in Medicaid Managed Care

机译:利用医生的财务激励措施和反馈来改善医疗补助管理式医疗中的儿科预防保健

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective. Immunizations and other cost-effective preventive services remain underused by many children, especially those living in poverty. Given the effectiveness of provider-based tracking systems and the widespread use by managed care organizations of financial incentives to influence physician practice patterns, we designed and tested an intervention combining these strategies. We studied whether a system of semiannual assessment and feedback, coupled with financial incentives, could improve pediatric preventive care in a Medicaid health maintenance organization (HMO).Methodology. We randomly assigned primary care sites serving children in a Medicaid HMO to one of three groups: a feedback group (where physicians received written feedback about compliance scores), a feedback and incentive group (where physicians received feedback and a financial bonus when compliance criteria were met), and a control group. We evaluated compliance with pediatric preventive care guidelines through semiannual chart audits during the years 1993 to 1995.Results. Compliance with pediatric preventive care improved dramatically in the study period. Repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated a significant increase in all three study groups throughout the time in total compliance scores (from 56%–73%), as well as scores for immunizations (from 62%–79%) and other preventive care (from 54%–71%). However, no significant differences were observed between either intervention group and the control group, nor were there any interaction (group-by-time) effects.Conclusions. Feedback to physicians, with or without financial incentives, did not improve pediatric preventive care in this Medicaid HMO during a time of rapid, secular improvements in care. Possible explanations include the context and timing of the intervention, the magnitude of the financial incentives, and lack of physician awareness of the intervention.
机译:目的。免疫和其他具有成本效益的预防服务仍然被许多儿童,尤其是生活贫困的儿童使用不足。鉴于基于提供者的跟踪系统的有效性以及管理型护理组织广泛使用的经济激励措施来影响医师的执业方式,我们设计并测试了结合这些策略的干预措施。我们研究了半年度评估和反馈系统以及财务激励措施是否可以改善医疗补助健康维持组织(HMO)中的儿科预防保健。我们将为Medicaid HMO中的儿童服务的初级保健地点随机分配到以下三个组之一:反馈组(医生收到有关依从性分数的书面反馈),反馈和激励组(当医生遵从标准达到时,医生接受反馈和经济奖励)认识)和一个对照组。我们通过1993年至1995年的半年图表审核评估了对儿科预防保健指南的遵守情况。在研究期间,对儿科预防保健的依从性大大提高。重复测量的方差分析表明,在这三个研究组中,总的依从性评分(从56%–73%)以及免疫接种的评分(从62%–79%)和其他预防性护理(从54%从54%)显着增加–71%)。然而,干预组和对照组之间均未观察到显着差异,也没有任何交互作用(按时间分组)。在快速,长期的医疗改善期间,无论是否有经济激励,对医生的反馈都无法改善该Medicaid HMO的儿科预防性护理。可能的解释包括干预的背景和时间,经济诱因的幅度以及医生对干预的意识不足。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号