...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Infant Massage Compared With Crib Vibrator in the Treatment of Colicky Infants
【24h】

Infant Massage Compared With Crib Vibrator in the Treatment of Colicky Infants

机译:婴儿按摩与婴儿床振动器相比较,治疗高脂血症婴儿

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of infant massage compared with that of a crib vibrator in the treatment of infantile colic.Methods. Infants 7 weeks of age and perceived as colicky by their parents were randomly assigned to an infant massage group ( n = 28) or a crib vibrator group ( n = 30). Three daily intervention periods were recommended in both groups. Parents recorded infant crying and given interventions in a structured cry diary that was kept for 1 week before (baseline) and for 3 weeks during the intervention. Parents were interviewed after the first and third weeks of intervention to obtain their evaluation of the effectiveness of the given massage or crib vibration.Results. At baseline, the mean amount of total crying was 3.6 (standard deviation: 1.4) hours/day in the massage group infants and 4.2 (2.0) hours/day in the vibrator group infants. The mean amount of colicky crying was 2.1 (standard deviation: 1.1) hours/day and 2.9 (1.5) hours/day, respectively. The mean number of daily intervention periods was 2.2 in both groups. Over the 4-week study, the amount of total and colicky crying decreased significantly in both intervention groups. The reduction in crying was similar in the study groups: total crying decreased by a mean 48% in the massage group and by 47% in the vibrator group, and colicky crying decreased by 64% and 52%, respectively. The amount of other crying (total crying minus colicky crying) remained stable in both groups over the intervention. Ninety-three percent of the parents in both groups reported that colic symptoms decreased over the 3-week intervention, and 61% of the parents in the massage group and 63% of the parents in the crib vibrator group perceived the 3-week intervention as colic reducing.Conclusions. Infant massage was comparable to the use of a crib vibrator in reducing crying in colicky infants. We suggest that the decrease of total and colicky crying in the present study reflects more the natural course of early infant crying and colic than a specific effect of the interventions.
机译:目的。为了评估婴儿按摩与婴儿床振动器相比在婴儿绞痛治疗中的有效性。 <7周龄且被其父母视为co大的婴儿被随机分配至婴儿按摩组(n = 28)或婴儿床振动器组(n = 30)。两组均建议三个每日干预期。父母将婴儿的哭声记录下来,并在结构化的哭泣日记中进行干预,该日记应在基线之前(基准)保存1周,在干预期间保存3周。在干预的第一周和第三周后,对父母进行了访谈,以评估他们对给定按摩或婴儿床振动的有效性。在基线时,按摩组婴儿的平均总哭声量为3.6(标准差:1.4)小时/天,振动棒组婴儿的平均哭声为4.2(2.0)小时/天。颈椎大哭的平均次数分别为每天2.1(标准差:1.1)小时/天和2.9(1.5)小时/天。两组的平均每日干预时间为2.2。在为期4周的研究中,两个干预组的总哭声和co哭声明显减少。在研究组中,哭声的减少是相似的:按摩组中的总哭声平均减少了48%,振动器组中的哭声平均减少了47%,colicky哭声分别减少了64%和52%。在整个干预过程中,两组中其他哭声(总哭声减去鸡眼哭声)的数量保持稳定。两组中有93%的父母报告在3周的干预中绞痛症状有所减轻,按摩组的61%的父母和婴儿床振动器组的63%的父母认为3周的干预为减少绞痛。结论。婴儿按摩与减少婴儿哭闹声的哭声可媲美婴儿床振动器。我们建议,在本研究中,总的哭闹声和哭闹声的减少比干预措施的特定效果更能反映婴儿早期哭闹和绞痛的自然过程。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号