...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Dental Caries of Refugee Children Compared With US Children
【24h】

Dental Caries of Refugee Children Compared With US Children

机译:与美国儿童相比,难民儿童的龋齿

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective. Dental care is a major unmet health need of refugee children. Many refugee children have never received oral health care or been exposed to common preventive oral health measures, such as a toothbrush, fluoridated toothpaste, or fluoridated water. Oral health problems among refugee children are most likely to be detected first by pediatricians and family practitioners. Given the increased influx of refugees into the United States, particularly children, it is important for the pediatric community to be aware of potential oral health problems among refugee children and be able to make referrals for treatment and recommendations for the prevention of future oral diseases. The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence of caries experience and untreated decay among newly arrived refugee children stratified by their region of origin and compared with US children.Methods. Oral health assessments were conducted within 1 month of arrival to the United States as part of the Refugee Health Assessment Program of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. The outcome variables include caries experience and untreated decay. Caries experience is determined by the presence of an untreated caries lesion, a restoration, or a permanent molar tooth that is missing because it has been extracted as a result of dental caries. Untreated caries is detected when 0.5 mm of tooth structure is lost and there is brown coloration of the walls of the cavity. Comparisons of the refugee children with US children in Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data were made using χ2 test of independence and multiple logistic regression.Results. Oral health screenings were performed on 224 newly arrived refugees who ranged in age from 6 months to 18 years and had a mean age of 10.6 years (SD: 4.82; median: 10.7 years). African refugees represented 53.6%, with the majority from Somalia, Liberia, and Sudan. Eastern European refugees composed 26.8% of the study sample. The remaining 19.6% come from a number of countries, such as Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the Middle East. Refugee children had 51.3% caries experience and 48.7% with untreated decay. Caries experience in refugees varied by region of origin, with 38% from Africa exhibiting a history of caries compared with 79.7% of Eastern Europeans. The highest proportion of children with no obvious dental problems was from Africa (40.5%) compared with 16.9% from Eastern Europe. US children had caries experience similar to that of refugees (49.3%) but significantly lower risk of untreated decay (22.8%). Comparisons between refugee children and US children found significant differences for treatment urgency, untreated caries, extent of dental caries, and presence of oral pain. White refugee children, primarily from Eastern Europe, were 2.8 times as likely to have caries experience compared with white US children, with 9.4 times the risk of untreated decay compared with white US children. In contrast, African refugee children were only half as likely to have caries experience compared with white US children (95% confidence interval: 0.3-0.7) and African American children (95% confidence interval: 0.3-0.7). However, African refugee children were similar to African American children in risk of untreated decay (odds ratio: 0.94).Conclusion. African refugee children had significantly lower dental caries experience as well as fewer untreated caries as compared with similarly aged Eastern European refugee children. They were also less likely to have ever been to a dentist. Possible reasons for these findings may include differences in exposure to natural fluoride in the drinking water, dietary differences, access to professional care, and cultural beliefs and practices. The prevalence of caries experience and untreated caries differed significantly between refugee children and US children. These differences varied significantly by race. When refugee children were compared with US children, the African refugee children had only half the caries experience of either white or African American children. However, African refugee children had similar likelihood of having untreated caries as compared with African American children, despite that very few African children had previous access to professional dental care. These findings are consistent with previous studies on health disparities in the United States. White refugee children, primarily from Eastern Europe, were also 3 times as likely to have caries experience compared with either white or African American children and were 9.4 times as likely to have untreated caries as white US children. Refugee children are more likely to establish primary medical care before seeking dental treatment. With the limited access to dental care among refugees, pediatricians should be particularly alert to the risk of oral diseases among refugee children.
机译:目的。牙科保健是难民儿童未满足的主要健康需求。许多难民儿童从未接受过口腔保健,也从未接受过常见的预防性口腔保健措施,例如牙刷,氟化牙膏或氟化水。儿科医生和家庭医生最有可能首先发现难民儿童的口腔健康问题。鉴于越来越多的难民,特别是儿童涌入美国,对儿科界来说,重要的是要意识到难民儿童中潜在的口腔健康问题,并能够转介治疗和预防未来口腔疾病的建议。这项研究的目的是描述按原籍地区分层并与美国儿童进行比较的新来难民儿童的龋病患病率和未得到治疗的衰退。口腔健康评估是在到达美国后的1个月内进行的,这是马萨诸塞州公共卫生部的难民健康评估计划的一部分。结果变量包括龋齿经历和未治疗的衰变。龋齿的经验取决于是否存在未治疗的龋齿,修复体或恒磨牙而缺失,因为它们是由于龋齿而被拔出的。当丢失0.5毫米的牙齿结构并且腔壁呈棕色时,可检测到未处理的龋齿。使用独立性的χ2检验和多元logistic回归对第三次全国健康与营养检查调查数据中的难民儿童与美国儿童进行比较。对224名新来的难民进行了口腔健康检查,这些难民的年龄从6个月到18岁不等,平均年龄为10.6岁(标准差:4.82;中位数:10.7岁)。非洲难民占53.6%,其中大多数来自索马里,利比里亚和苏丹。东欧难民占研究样本的26.8%。其余的19.6%来自许多国家,例如阿富汗,巴基斯坦和中东。难民儿童有51.3%的龋齿经历,有48.7%的龋齿未经治疗。难民的龋病经历因地区而异,非洲有38%的人有龋病史,而东欧人的这一比例为79.7%。没有明显牙齿问题的儿童比例最高的是非洲(40.5%),而东欧则为16.9%。美国儿童的龋齿经历与难民相似(49.3%),但未得到治疗的龋齿风险大大降低(22.8%)。难民儿童和美国儿童之间的比较发现,在治疗紧迫性,未治疗的龋齿,龋齿范围和口腔疼痛方面存在显着差异。与美国白人儿童相比,主要来自东欧的白人难民儿童患龋齿的可能性是美国白人儿童的2.8倍,未经治疗的龋齿风险是美国白人儿童的9.4倍。相比之下,与美国白人儿童(95%的置信区间:0.3-0.7)和非洲裔美国儿童(95%的置信区间:0.3-0.7)相比,非洲难民儿童患龋齿的可能性仅为其一半。但是,非洲难民儿童与非裔美国儿童相似,但有未经治疗的衰退风险(优势比:0.94)。结论。与类似年龄的东欧难民儿童相比,非洲难民儿童的龋齿经历大大降低,未治疗的龋齿也更​​少。他们去过牙医的可能性也较小。这些发现的可能原因可能包括饮用水中天然氟暴露的差异,饮食差异,获得专业护理的机会以及文化信仰和习惯。难民儿童和美国儿童的龋病患病率和未治疗的龋齿差异很大。这些差异因种族而异。当将难民儿童与美国儿童进行比较时,非洲难民儿童的龋齿经历只有白人或非洲裔美国儿童的一半。但是,与非洲裔美国儿童相比,非洲难民儿童未受龋齿的可能性与非裔美国儿童相似,尽管此前很少有非洲儿童获得过专业的牙科护理。这些发现与美国先前关于健康差异的研究一致。与白人或非裔美国儿童相比,主要来自东欧的白人难民儿童患龋齿的可能性也比美国白人儿童高3倍,未患龋齿的可能性是美国白人儿童的9.4倍。难民儿童在寻求牙科治疗之前更有可能建立初级医疗服务。由于难民获得牙科保健的机会有限,儿科医生应该特别警惕难民儿童中口腔疾病的风险。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号