...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Pediatricians' Reported Practices Regarding Developmental Screening: Do Guidelines Work? Do They Help?
【24h】

Pediatricians' Reported Practices Regarding Developmental Screening: Do Guidelines Work? Do They Help?

机译:儿科医生关于发育筛查的报道做法:指南有效吗?他们有帮助吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background. In 2001, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) adopted a policy that all infants and young children should be screened for developmental delays at regular intervals. The policy statement promoted the use of valid reliable instruments. It is unknown, however, what proportion of pediatricians follow this recommendation and whether such a practice is associated with improved identification of children with developmental difficulties.Objectives. To describe the use of developmental screening tests among board-certified pediatricians practicing general pediatrics and to determine the association between standardized screening and the self-reported identification of children with developmental difficulties.Methods. We mailed a survey to a random sample of AAP members. We used multivariate logistic/linearregression analyses to determine the association between standardized screening and the self-reported identification of children with developmental disabilities.Results. Of the 1617 surveys mailed, 894 were returned, for a response rate of 55%. Of the respondents, 646 practiced general pediatrics and were included in the analysis. Seventy-one percent of those pediatricians indicated that they almost always used clinical assessment without an accompanying screening instrument to identify children with developmental delays. Only 23% indicated that they used a standardized screening instrument. The most commonly used instrument was the Denver II. Logistic regression modeling demonstrated odds ratios between 1.71 and 1.90 for a 10% rate of identification of developmental problems among patients of pediatricians reporting standardized screening. Each adjusted odds ratio bordered on statistical significance. Linear-regression models estimating the difference in mean proportions of children identified with developmental problems across screening groups failed to show a statistically or clinically significant difference in physician-reported identification rates.Conclusions. Our findings indicate that, despite the AAP policy and national efforts to improve developmental screening in the primary care setting, few pediatricians use effective means to screen their patients for developmental problems. It is uncertain whether standardized screening, as it is practiced currently, is associated with an increase in the self-reported identification of children with developmental disabilities.
机译:背景。 2001年,美国儿科学会(AAP)采取了一项政策,即应定期对所有婴幼儿进行发育迟缓筛查。该政策声明提倡使用有效的可靠工具。然而,尚不清楚的是,有多少比例的儿科医生遵循该建议,以及这种做法是否与改善对发育障碍儿童的识别有关。目的:描述发展性筛查测试在执业普通儿科的经董事会认证的儿科医生中的使用,并确定标准化筛查与发育困难儿童自我报告的鉴定之间的关联。我们将调查问卷邮寄给AAP成员的随机样本。我们使用多元logistic /线性回归分析来确定标准化筛查与发育障碍儿童自我报告的识别之间的关联。在邮寄的1617份调查中,有894份被退回,答复率为55%。在受访者中,有646名实践了普通儿科,并被纳入分析。这些儿科医生中的71%表示,他们几乎总是使用临床评估而没有随附的筛查工具来识别发育迟缓的儿童。只有23%的人表示他们使用了标准化的筛查工具。最常用的仪器是丹佛II。 Logistic回归模型表明,报告标准化筛查的儿科医生患者中发现发育问题的比率> 10%,比值比在1.71至1.90之间。每个调整后的优势比都具有统计学意义。线性回归模型估计的筛查组中被发现患有发育问题的儿童的平均比例差异未能显示出医生报告的鉴定率在统计学或临床上的显着差异。我们的发现表明,尽管AAP政策和国家为改善初级保健环境中的发育筛查做出了努力,但很少有儿科医生使用有效手段筛查其患者的发育问题。目前尚不确定标准化筛查是否与目前自我报告的对发育障碍儿童的认同感增加有关。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号