...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Health of Children Adopted From Guatemala: Comparison of Orphanage and Foster Care
【24h】

Health of Children Adopted From Guatemala: Comparison of Orphanage and Foster Care

机译:危地马拉收养儿童的健康:孤儿院和寄养机构的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective. Since 1986, American parents have adopted 17300 children from Guatemala. This study assessed the health, growth, and developmental status of 103 Guatemalan adopted children (48 girls; 55 boys) after arrival in the United States. Physical evidence suggestive of prenatal alcohol exposure and adequacy of vaccinations administered were also reviewed.Methods. Retrospective chart review was conducted of 103 children who were evaluated after arrival in the United States in an international adoption specialty clinic, and a case-matched study was conducted of a subgroup of 50 children who resided in either an orphanage or foster care before adoption. Mean age at arrival was 16 ± 19 months. Before adoption, 25 children resided in orphanages, 56 resided in foster care, and 22 resided in mixed-care settings. The 25 children who had resided in orphanages before adoption were matched for age at arrival, interval from arrival to clinic visit, and gender with a child adopted from foster care. Health and developmental status of these matched pairs were compared, allowing the first direct comparison of children raised in orphanages or foster care before adoption.Results. Mild growth delays were frequent among the children. Mean z scores for weight, height, and head circumference were, respectively, ?1.00, ?1.04, and ?1.08. Children from foster care had significantly better z scores for height, weight, and head circumference than those from orphanage or mixed care. Among children who were younger than 2 years at arrival, growth measurements correlated inversely with age at arrival. Infectious diseases included intestinal parasites (8%) and latent tuberculosis infection (7%). Other medical conditions included anemia (30%), elevated lead levels (3%), and (using strict criteria) phenotypic facial features suggestive of prenatal alcohol exposure (28%). Adequacy of vaccine records from Guatemala was assessed: 28% met American Academy of Pediatrics standards for vaccine administration. Unsuspected significant medical diagnoses, including congenital anomalies and ocular, neurologic, and orthopedic problems, were found in 14%. Most children were doing well developmentally (80–92% of expected performance), but 14% had global developmental delays. Cognition, expressive and receptive language, and activities of daily living skills correlated inversely with age at arrival for children who were younger than 2 years at adoption. Among the 50 matched children, those who resided in foster care before adoption had better measurements for height, weight, and head circumference at arrival to the United States. Moreover, those who resided in foster care scored significantly better for cognitive skills than those who had previously resided in orphanages (96.3% of age-expected compared with 88.3% of age-expected); other skills did not differ between the 2 groups. No differences were found between the 2 groups of children related to prevalence of medical diagnoses or phenotypic evidence suggesting prenatal alcohol exposure.Conclusions. Guatemalan adoptees display similar overall patterns of growth and developmental delays as seen in other groups of internationally adopted children, although not as severe. Younger children had better growth and development (cognition, language, and activities of daily living skills) than older children, regardless of location of residence before adoption. Among children who were matched for age, gender, and interval from adoption to evaluation, those who had resided in foster care had better growth and cognitive scores than children who had resided in orphanages before adoption. These findings support the need for timely adoptive placement of young infants and support the placement of children in attentive foster care rather than orphanages when feasible.
机译:目的。自1986年以来,美国父母从危地马拉收养了超过17300名儿童。这项研究评估了103名危地马拉收养的儿童(48名女孩; 55名男孩)的健康,生长和发育状况。还审查了表明产前酒精暴露和接种疫苗充分性的物理证据。回顾性图表审查了103名儿童,这些儿童在到达美国后在国际收养专科诊所接受了评估,并且对50名在收养前住在孤儿院或寄养机构中的儿童进行了病例匹配研究。到达时的平均年龄为16±19个月。在收养之前,有25名儿童住在孤儿院,56名住在寄养家庭,22名住在混合照料环境。在收养之前居住在孤儿院中的25名儿童与到达时的年龄,从到达到诊所就诊的间隔以及与从寄养机构收养的孩子的性别相匹配。比较了这些配对对的健康状况和发育状况,从而可以在收养之前对孤儿院或寄养儿童中的孩子进行首次直接比较。儿童中经常出现轻度的生长迟缓。体重,身高和头围的平均z得分分别为?1.00,?1.04和?1.08。来自寄养儿童的身高,体重和头围的z得分明显高于孤儿院或混合照料的孩子。在到达年龄小于2岁的儿童中,成长指标与到达年龄成反比。传染病包括肠道寄生虫(8%)和潜伏性结核感染(7%)。其他医学状况包括贫血(30%),铅水平升高(3%)和(使用严格标准)暗示产前酒精暴露的表型面部特征(28%)。评估了危地马拉疫苗记录的充分性:28%的疫苗符合美国儿科学会的疫苗管理标准。在14%的人群中发现了未经怀疑的重大医学诊断,包括先天性异常以及眼,神经和骨科问题。大多数儿童的发育状况良好(占预期成绩的80-92%),但14%的儿童发育迟缓。收养年龄小于2岁的儿童的认知,表达和接受语言以及日常生活技能的活动与到达年龄成反比。在这50个匹配的孩子中,那些在收养之前住在寄养机构中的孩子在到达美国时可以更好地测量身高,体重和头围。此外,与以前居住在孤儿院的人相比,居住在寄养所的人的认知技能得分要高得多(预期年龄的96.3%,而预期年龄的88.3%);两组之间的其他技能没有差异。两组患儿的医学诊断患病率或表型证据表明产前饮酒均未发现差异。危地马拉的收养者表现出与其他国际收养儿童群体相似的增长和发育迟缓的总体模式,尽管不那么严重。年龄较小的儿童比年龄较大的儿童具有更好的成长和发展(认知,语言和日常生活技能活动),无论其在收养之前居住在何处。在年龄,性别以及收养到评估的时间间隔相匹配的孩子中,与收养前住在孤儿院的孩子相比,寄养在寄养中的孩子的生长和认知得分更高。这些发现支持了对及时婴儿的及时收养的需要,并在可行的情况下支持了对儿童的关注性寄养,而不是孤儿院。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号