...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Cardiac Safety of Central Nervous System Stimulants in Children and Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
【24h】

Cardiac Safety of Central Nervous System Stimulants in Children and Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

机译:注意缺陷/多动障碍的儿童和青少年中枢神经系统兴奋剂的心脏安全性

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES. Case reports have raised concerns about the risk of cardiac events associated with central nervous system stimulants for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.PATIENTS AND METHODS. This was a retrospective cohort study that used 10 years (July 1994 to June 2004) of Florida Medicaid claims data cross-linked to Vital Statistics Death Registry data. The cohort was composed of all youth 3 to 20 years old who were newly diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Each month of follow-up was classified according to stimulant claims (methylphenidate, amphetamines, and pemoline) as current use (active stimulant claim), former use (time after periods of current use), or nonuse (time preceding the first stimulant claim, including follow-up of youth who were never exposed to stimulants). The study's end points were (1) cardiac death, (2) first hospital admission for cardiac causes or (3) first emergency department visit for cardiac causes. Risks were compared with time-dependent Cox regression analysis adjusting for various cardiac risk factors.RESULTS. During 124932 person-years of observation (n = 55383), 73 youth died, 5 because of cardiac causes. No cardiac death occurred during 42612 person-years of stimulant use. Hospital admissions for cardiac cause occurred for 27 children (8 during stimulant use, 11 during 35671 person-years of former use, and 8 during 46649 person-years of nonuse); and 1091 children visited the emergency department for cardiac causes (8.7 per 1000 person-years). Current stimulant use was associated with a 20% increase in the hazard for emergency department visits when compared with nonuse. No increased risk was found for periods of former use when compared with nonuse.CONCLUSIONS. Incidence rates of cardiac events requiring hospitalization were small and similar to national background rates. Stimulants were associated with an increase in cardiac emergency department visits. More evidence is needed that addresses the long-term risk/benefit of the various treatment options and the effect of other cardiac risk factors and comedications.
机译:目标病例报告引起了人们对与中枢神经系统兴奋剂治疗注意力不足/多动障碍有关的心脏事件风险的担忧。患者和方法。这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用了10年(1994年7月至2004年6月)的佛罗里达医疗补助索赔数据与生命统计数据死亡登记处数据交叉链接。该队列由所有3至20岁的新诊断为注意力缺陷/多动障碍的年轻人组成。根据兴奋剂声明(哌醋甲酯,苯丙胺和匹莫林)将每个月的随访分为当前使用(积极使用兴奋剂),以前使用(当前使用一段时间后)或不使用(第一次使用兴奋剂之前的时间,包括对从未接触过兴奋剂的年轻人的随访)。该研究的终点是(1)心脏死亡,(2)心脏原因首次入院或(3)心脏原因首次急诊就诊。将风险与时间依赖性Cox回归分析进行比较,以调整各种心脏风险因素。在124932人年的观察期间(n = 55383),有73名青年死亡,5名是由于心脏原因死亡。在使用兴奋剂的42612人年期间,没有发生心源性死亡。因心脏病原因入院的儿童有27名(在使用兴奋剂时有8名,在以前使用35671人年期间有11名,在没有使用时有46649人年8名);有1091名儿童因心脏原因前往急诊室(每千人年8.7)。与不使用兴奋剂相比,当前使用兴奋剂会使急诊就诊的危险性增加20%。与不使用相比,以前使用期间未发现增加的风险。需要住院的心脏事件的发生率很小,与国家背景发生率相似。兴奋剂与心脏急诊就诊次数增加有关。需要更多的证据来解决各种治疗方案的长期风险/益处以及其他心脏风险因素和喜剧的影响。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号