...
【24h】

School Recess and Group Classroom Behavior

机译:学校课间休息和小组课堂行为

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES. This study examines the amount of recess that children 8 to 9 years of age receive in the United States and compares the group classroom behavior of children receiving daily recess with that of children not receiving daily recess.METHODS. This is a secondary analysis of a public-use data set, the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998–1999, third-grade data set. Children were categorized into 2 levels of recess exposure, that is, none/minimal break (1 break of 15 minutes/day) or some recess. Some recess was further categorized into 5 levels on the basis of frequency and duration of recess. Child, parent, school, and classroom characteristics of those with and without recess were compared. The group classroom behavior was assessed by using the teacher's rating of class behavior.RESULTS. Complete data were available for 10301 to 11624 children 8 to 9 years of age. There were equal numbers of boys and girls (boys: 50.3%). Children exposed to none/minimal break (30%) were much more likely to be black, to be from families with lower incomes and lower levels of education, to live in large cities, to be from the Northeast or South, and to attend public school, compared with those with recess. Teacher's rating of classroom behavior scores were better for children with some recess than for those with none/minimal break. This finding was maintained in multivariate regression analysis. However, among children receiving daily recess, the teacher's rating of class behavior scores did not differ significantly according to the level of exposure.CONCLUSIONS. These results indicated that, among 8- to 9-year-old children, having ≥1 daily recess period of 15 minutes in length was associated with better teacher's rating of class behavior scores. This study suggests that schoolchildren in this age group should be provided with daily recess.
机译:目标这项研究调查了美国8至9岁的儿童所接受的课间休息量,并比较了每天课间休息的孩子和没有每天课间休息的孩子在课堂上的行为。这是对公共用途数据集的二次分析,即1998-1999年幼儿园纵向早教研究,三年级数据集。将儿童分为2个等级的隐身暴露水平,即无/最小休息时间(<1分钟15分钟/天)或一些隐性休息时间。根据休会的频率和持续时间,将一些休会进一步分为5个级别。比较了有和没有休息的孩子的孩子,父母,学校和教室的特征。通过使用教师对课堂行为的评价来评估小组课堂行为。对于8至9岁的10301至11624名儿童,可获得完整的数据。男孩和女孩的数量相等(男孩:50.3%)。零休假/小休的孩子(30%)更有可能是黑人,来自收入较低和教育水平较低的家庭,住在大城市,来自东北或南部,以及参加公共场合学校,与那些有休息的人相比。有休息的孩子比没有休息或休息时间最少的孩子对课堂行为得分的老师评价要好。这一发现在多元回归分析中得以维持。但是,在每天休课的孩子中,老师的课堂行为评分等级根据暴露水平而无明显差异。这些结果表明,在8至9岁的儿童中,每天休息时间≥15分钟且≥1分钟的时间与教师对课堂行为得分的评分更高有关。这项研究表明,该年龄段的学童应每天休息。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号