首页> 外文期刊>The Astrophysical journal >MERGERS AND BULGE FORMATION IN ΛCDM: WHICH MERGERS MATTER?
【24h】

MERGERS AND BULGE FORMATION IN ΛCDM: WHICH MERGERS MATTER?

机译:ΛCDM中的合并和凸起形成:哪些合并很重要?

获取原文
           

摘要

We use a suite of semi-empirical models to predict the galaxy-galaxy merger rate and relative contributions to bulge growth as a function of mass (both halo and stellar), redshift, and mass ratio. The models use empirical constraints on the halo occupation distribution, evolved forward in time, to robustly identify where and when galaxy mergers occur. Together with the results of high-resolution merger simulations, this allows us to quantify the relative contributions of mergers with different properties (e.g., mass ratios, gas fractions, redshifts) to the bulge population. We compare with observational constraints, and find good agreement. We also provide useful fitting functions and make public a code to reproduce the predicted merger rates and contributions to bulge mass growth. We identify several robust conclusions. (1) Major mergers dominate the formation and assembly of ~L * bulges and the total spheroid mass density, but minor mergers contribute a non-negligible ~30%. (2) This is mass dependent: bulge formation and assembly is dominated by more minor mergers in lower-mass systems. In higher-mass systems, most bulges originally form in major mergers near ~L *, but assemble in increasingly minor mergers. (3) The minor/major contribution is also morphology dependent: higher B/T systems preferentially form in more major mergers, with B/T roughly tracing the mass ratio of the largest recent merger; lower B/T systems preferentially form in situ from minor mergers. (4) Low-mass galaxies, being gas-rich, require more mergers to reach the same B/T as high-mass systems. Gas-richness dramatically suppresses the absolute efficiency of bulge formation, but does not strongly influence the relative contribution of major versus minor mergers. (5) Absolute merger rates at fixed mass ratio increase with galaxy mass. (6) Predicted merger rates agree well with those observed in pair and morphology-selected samples, but there is evidence that some morphology-selected samples include contamination from minor mergers. (7) Predicted rates also agree with the integrated growth in bulge mass density with cosmic time, but with a factor ~2 uncertainty in both—up to half the bulge mass density could come from non-merger processes. We systematically vary the model assumptions, totaling ~103 model permutations, and quantify the resulting uncertainties. Our conclusions regarding the importance of different mergers for bulge formation are very robust to these changes. The absolute predicted merger rates are systematically uncertain at the factor ~2 level; uncertainties grow at the lowest masses and high redshifts.
机译:我们使用一组半经验模型来预测星系-星系合并率以及对凸出增长的相对贡献,这些变化是质量(晕圈和恒星),红移和质量比的函数。这些模型使用对光晕职业分布的经验约束(随时间向前发展)来稳健地确定星系合并发生的时间和地点。结合高分辨率合并模拟的结果,这使我们能够量化具有不同属性(例如质量比,气体分数,红移)的合并对膨胀人口的相对贡献。我们与观测约束进行比较,并找到良好的一致性。我们还提供有用的拟合函数,并公开代码以重现预测的合并率和对大规模增长的贡献。我们确定了几个可靠的结论。 (1)大型合并主导着〜L *凸起的形成和组装以及总体球体质量密度,但是小型合并贡献了不可忽略的〜30%。 (2)这取决于质量:在较低质量的系统中,较小的合并会导致隆起的形成和组装。在较高质量的系统中,大多数凸起最初形成于〜L *附近的大型合并中,但在越来越小的合并中聚集。 (3)次要/主要贡献也取决于形态:较高的B / T系统优先形成于较大的合并中,B / T大致追随最近最大合并的质量比;较低的B / T系统优先由小规模合并原位形成。 (4)富含气体的低质量星系需要更多的合并才能达到与高质量系统相同的B / T。丰富的气体极大地抑制了膨胀形成的绝对效率,但是并没有强烈影响大型和小型合并的相对贡献。 (5)固定质量比率下的绝对合并率随星系质量而增加。 (6)预测的合并率与成对样本和形态选择样本中观察到的合并率非常吻合,但是有证据表明,某些形态选择样本中包含来自小型合并的污染。 (7)预测的速率也与宇宙时间的膨胀质量密度的整体增长相一致,但是两者的不确定性都约为2 —最高膨胀质量密度的一半可能来自非合并过程。我们系统地改变模型假设,总计约103个模型排列,并对量化的不确定性进行量化。我们关于不同合并对形成凸起的重要性的结论对于这些变化非常有力。系统预测的绝对合并率在系数〜2的水平上是系统不确定的;最低质量和高红移会带来不确定性。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号