...
【24h】

Comparison between surgery and physiotherapy in the treatment of small and medium-sized tears of the rotator cuff

机译:物理疗法与物理疗法在中小型肩袖撕裂治疗中的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

In order to compare the outcome from surgical repair and physiotherapy, 103 patients with symptomatic small and medium-sized tears of the rotator cuff were randomly allocated to one of the two approaches. The primary outcome measure was the Constant score, and secondary outcome measures included the self-report section of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the Short Form 36 Health Survey and subscores for shoulder movement, pain, strength and patient satisfaction. Scores were taken at baseline and after six and 12 months by a blinded assessor. Nine patients (18%) with insufficient benefit from physiotherapy after at least 15 treatment sessions underwent secondary surgical treatment.Analysis of between-group differences showed better results for the surgery group on the Constant scale (difference 13.0 points, p ? 0.002), on the American Shoulder and Elbow surgeons scale (difference 16.1 points, p < 0.0005), for pain-free abduction (difference 28.8°, p = 0.003) and for reduction in pain (difference on a visual analogue scale ?1.7 cm, p < 0.0005).
机译:为了比较手术修复和理疗的结果,将103例有症状的中袖旋转眼泪患者随机分配至两种方法之一。主要结局指标为“恒定”评分,次要结局指标包括“美国肩膀和肘部外科医生”评分的自我报告部分,“ 36型健康简表”以及有关肩膀运动,疼痛,力量和患者满意度的评分。盲人评估者在基线时以及六个月和十二个月后进行评分。至少15个疗程后有9名患者(18%)未能从物理疗法中受益,接受了二次外科手术治疗。组间差异的分析显示,在恒定量表上,手术组的结果更好(差异13.0点,p≥0.002),而美国肩肘外科医师量表(差异16.1点,p <0.0005),无痛外展(差异28.8°,p = 0.003)和疼痛减轻(视觉模拟量表差异1.7 cm,p <0.0005) )。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号