...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Burnout Levels of Physical Education Teachers According to Personal Factors
【24h】

Burnout Levels of Physical Education Teachers According to Personal Factors

机译：个人因素对体育教师职业倦怠的影响

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This research has been done in order to examine the burnout levels of physical education (P.E.) teachers. 275 PE teachers, who serve in the 2012-2013 academic year at the secondary and high schools under the Ministry of National Education assigned in Ordu province constitute the research process. In addition, 163 PE teachers assigned in Ordu province who have been contacted by “random sampling method” constitute the sampling group of the research. In order to collect the data, “Personal Information Form” and “Maslach Exhaustion Inventory-Educator Form” have been used. In analysing the data; the test of independent group for the comparison of two groups in terms of test of normality, one way variant analysis for the comparisons of three or more groups; due to homogeneity of variants, Scheffe and LSD multiple comparison tests of post-hoc tests have been used in order to determine the source variations found meaningful of the one way variant analysis. As a result of this review it has been determined that some of the data do not have a normal distribution and Mann-Whitney U test has been used for binary cluster comparison. For the statistical analysis in the research, significance levels have been taken as 0.05 and 0.01.According to the results of the research; gender, marital and educational status of physical education teachers create no difference in their levels of burnout. Statistically significant differences were not observed for the age of teachers in the emotional and depersonalisation subscale scores mean (p> 0.05).A significant difference has been detected in personal achievement scores mean which is one of the subscales of burn out (p <0.05).In comparison of the groups;the difference seen is that,the average of teachers who are 40 years old and above (24,39±3,56) is higher than the average of ones that are 20-29(22,16±3,63) and 30-39 (22,68±3,74) years old.
机译：进行这项研究是为了检验体育教师的倦怠程度。 275名体育老师组成了研究过程，他们在2012-2013学年在奥尔杜省分配的国家教育部下属的中学和中学任教。此外，通过“随机抽样法”与奥尔杜省分配的163名体育教师构成了研究的抽样组。为了收集数据，使用了“个人信息表”和“疟疾穷竭量表-教育者表”。在分析数据时;就正常性检验而言，独立组的检验用于两组的比较，三组或更多组的比较的单向变异分析;由于变体的同质性，已使用Scheffe和LSD进行事后测试的多次比较测试，以确定确定单向变体分析有意义的来源变体。审查的结果是，确定某些数据不具有正态分布，Mann-Whitney U检验已用于二进制聚类比较。为了进行统计分析，研究的显着性水平分别为0.05和0.01。体育教师的性别，婚姻状况和教育状况对他们的倦怠程度没有影响。在情绪和非人格化量表中，教师年龄未见统计学差异（p> 0.05）。个人成就感平均值是倦怠中的一个量表之一（p <0.05）。各组之间的比较;所看到的差异是，40岁及以上的教师的平均水平（24,39±3,56）高于20-29岁的教师的平均水平（22,16± 3,63）和30-39（22,68±3,74）岁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号