...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of conventional and revised isolator blood culture tubes.
【24h】

Comparison of conventional and revised isolator blood culture tubes.

机译:常规和改良隔离器血液培养管的比较。

获取原文
           

摘要

A paired clinical study compared bacterial and fungal recovery from 4,553 blood cultures processed by the conventional Isolator (Du Pont Co.) and a revised Isolator consisting of a single-stoppered, round-bottom tube containing the same ingredients as the conventional tube except for an inert fluorochemical. Excluding contaminants, there were 425 positive blood cultures with 450 isolates representing 208 patients. There were no statistically significant differences between systems in the number of positive cultures or patients with positive cultures for each organism group studied, nor were there any statistically significant differences between systems in the time required for detection of positive cultures.
机译:一项配对的临床研究比较了常规隔离器(杜邦公司)和经过改良的隔离器(包括单塞圆底试管)的细菌和真菌从4,553血液培养物中的回收率,该试管包含与常规试管相同的成分,除了惰性氟化物。除污染物外,有425例阳性血液培养物和450株分离株,代表208名患者。对于每个研究的生物体组,阳性培养物数量或带有阳性培养物的患者之间的系统之间没有统计学上的显着差异,而且检测阳性培养物所需的时间之间,系统之间也没有统计学上的显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号