...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of the MicroScan system with the API Staph-Ident system for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci.
【24h】

Comparison of the MicroScan system with the API Staph-Ident system for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

机译：将MicroScan系统与API Staph-Ident系统进行比较，以鉴定凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌。

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

To evaluate the accuracy of the MicroScan System (American Hospital Supply Corp., Sacramento, Calif.) for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci, we tested 175 clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci. The results obtained by the MicroScan system were compared with those of the API Staph-Ident system (Analytab Products, Plainview, N.Y.). Forty-three discrepancies between the two systems were resolved by the conventional method of Kloos and Schleifer (W.E. Kloos and K.H. Schleifer, J. Clin. Microbiol. 1:82-88, 1975). The MicroScan and the Staph-Ident systems correctly identified 146 (86.4%) and 154 (88%) of 175 strains, respectively. The API system failed to identify phosphatase-negative Staphylococcus epidermidis. The MicroScan system demonstrated the greatest accuracy in the identification of S. epidermidis and S. saprophyticus, whereas lesser accuracy was achieved with S. hominis, S. warneri, and S. sciuri.
机译：为了评估MicroScan系统（加利福尼亚州萨克拉曼多的美国医院供应公司）鉴定凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌的准确性，我们测试了175种临床分离的凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌。将MicroScan系统获得的结果与API Staph-Ident系统（Analytab Products，Plainview，N.Y。）的结果进行比较。通过Kloos和Schleifer的常规方法（W.E.Kloos和K.H.Schleifer，J.Clin.Microbiol.1：82-88，1975）解决了两个系统之间的43个差异。 MicroScan和Staph-Ident系统分别正确识别了175个菌株中的146个（86.4％）和154个（88％）。 API系统无法识别出磷酸酶阴性的表皮葡萄球菌。 MicroScan系统在表皮葡萄球菌和腐生链球菌的鉴定中显示出最高的准确度，而人沙门氏菌，华氏链球菌和s。sciuri的准确度较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号