...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effect of Crook Lying Position versus Sitting Position on Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Healthy Individuals
【24h】

A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effect of Crook Lying Position versus Sitting Position on Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Healthy Individuals

机译：评估弯曲躺姿和坐姿对健康个体强迫肺活量（FVC）影响的比较研究

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

To prove the effect of body position on the Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and to find out the better position amongst the sitting and crook lying position as both are considered to be the best respiratory positions as far as FVC is concerned, but no research work is done to find out the better amongst the two.Materials and Methods: We analyzed the FVC of the randomly selected 100 subjects (both males and females) in sitting and crook lying position respectively. Computerized Pulmonary Function Testing (PFT) apparatus was used for analysis where three readings of FVC were taken in each position from which best ones were taken for analysis.Results: Mean FVC in crook lying position was found out to be 88.83% as compared to 99.07% in sitting position showing a difference of 10.24 %. The values were analyzed by using standard t-test which gave t-value 18.4316 and p-value 0.0001 which is statistically significant.Conclusion: The results show that FVC was more in sitting position as compared to crook lying position.
机译：为了证明身体姿势对强制肺活量（FVC）的影响，并在坐姿和弯曲躺姿中找出更好的姿势，因为就FVC而言，两者均被认为是最佳的呼吸姿势，但是尚无研究工作材料和方法：我们分析了随机选择的100名坐着和弯曲躺着的受试者（男性和女性）的FVC。使用计算机肺功能测试（PFT）仪器进行分析，在每个位置取三个FVC读数，从中进行最佳分析。结果：弯曲位置的FVC平均值为99.07％的88.83％。坐姿百分比显示出10.24％的差异。通过标准t检验对这些值进行分析，其给出t值18.4316和p值0.0001，这在统计学上是有意义的。结论：结果表明，与弯曲躺卧位置相比，FVC更多地处于坐姿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号