...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Indwelling Catheterization in Caesarean Section: Time To Retire It!
【24h】

Indwelling Catheterization in Caesarean Section: Time To Retire It!

机译:剖宫产术中留置导尿:该退休了!

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Routine placement of indwelling catheter preoperatively in Caesarean Section is being practiced without justified scientific evidence. Aim: To evaluate the effect of routine indwelling catheterization on the postoperative ambulation, morbidity and hospital stay in women undergoing Caesarean section. S ettings and Design: Case-Control study carried in a tertiary teaching hospital. Materials and Methods: This study was carried over 150 women undergoing primary Caesarean section without any medical complication or pre-existing Urinary Tract Infections (UTI). The subjects were randomly allocated to 2 groups i.e. Group 1(Non-Catheterized; NC) and Group 2 (Catheterized for 24 hours postoperatively; C). Parameters noted were; duration of surgery, time of ambulation, postoperative voiding discomfort {graded as - no, mild, moderate-severe, by Visual Analog Scoring (VAS)}, incidence of UTI, postoperative urinary retention, need of postoperative antibiotics and duration of hospital stay. Statistical Analysis: Results were analysed using unpaired t-test. Results: There was no significant difference in duration of surgery and postoperative urinary retention in both groups. However, it was seen that non-catheterized patients had significantly earlier ambulation, shorter hospital stay, took less time for first voiding, lesser voiding discomfort, less incidence of UTI and lesser use of postoperative antibiotics. Conclusion: The routine use of indwelling catheter in Caesarean section is unscientific and unnecessary. There should be selective rather than routine catheterization.
机译:背景:术前常规在剖宫产术中放置留置导管没有合理的科学依据。目的:评估常规剖宫产术对剖宫产妇女术后活动,发病率和住院时间的影响。设置与设计:在一家三级教学医院进行病例对照研究。资料和方法:这项研究是对150例行原发性剖腹产手术的妇女进行的,没有任何医学并发症或既往存在尿路感染(UTI)。将受试者随机分为2组,即第1组(非导尿; NC)和第2组(术后24小时导尿; C)。指出的参数是;手术时间,行走时间,术后排尿不适{通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)分级为-,轻度,中度至重度},尿路感染发生率,术后尿retention留,术后需要抗生素和住院时间。统计分析:使用不成对的t检验分析结果。结果:两组的手术时间和术后尿retention留均无明显差异。但是,可以看到,非导管插入的患者有较早的下床活动,较短的住院时间,较少的第一次排尿时间,较少的排尿不适感,较少的UTI发生率和较少的术后抗生素使用。结论:剖宫产术中常规使用留置导管是不科学的,没有必要。应该选择导管而不是常规导管。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号