...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Evaluation of Hand Written and Computerized Out-Patient Prescriptions in Urban Part of Central Gujarat
【24h】

Evaluation of Hand Written and Computerized Out-Patient Prescriptions in Urban Part of Central Gujarat

机译:古吉拉特邦中部城市地区手写和计算机化门诊处方的评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Prescription order is an important therapeutic transaction between physician and patient. A good quality prescription is an extremely important factor for minimizing errors in dispensing medication and it should be adherent to guidelines for prescription writing for benefit of the patient. Aim: To evaluate frequency and type of prescription errors in outpatient prescriptions and find whether prescription writing abides with WHO standards of prescription writing. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted at Anand city. Allopathic private practitioners practising at Anand city of different specialities were included in study. Collection of prescriptions was started a month after the consent to minimize bias in prescription writing. The prescriptions were collected from local pharmacy stores of Anand city over a period of six months. Prescriptions were analysed for errors in standard information, according to WHO guide to good prescribing. Statistical Analysis: Descriptive analysis was performed to estimate frequency of errors, data were expressed as numbers and percentage. Results: Total 749 (549 handwritten and 200 computerised) prescriptions were collected. Abundant omission errors were identified in handwritten prescriptions e.g., OPD number was mentioned in 6.19%, patient?s age was mentioned in 25.50%, gender in 17.30%, address in 9.29% and weight of patient mentioned in 11.29%, while in drug items only 2.97% drugs were prescribed by generic name. Route and Dosage form was mentioned in 77.35%-78.15%, dose mentioned in 47.25%, unit in 13.91%, regimens were mentioned in 72.93% while signa (direction for drug use) in 62.35%. Total 4384 errors out of 549 handwritten prescriptions and 501 errors out of 200 computerized prescriptions were found in clinicians and patient details. While in drug item details, total number of errors identified were 5015 and 621 in handwritten and computerized prescriptions respectively. Conclusion: As compared to handwritten prescriptions, computerized prescriptions appeared to be associated with relatively lower rates of error. Since out-patient prescription errors are abundant and often occur in handwritten prescriptions, prescribers need to adapt themselves to computerized prescription order entry in their daily practice.
机译:简介:开处方是医师和患者之间的重要治疗事务。高质量的处方是最小化配药错误的极其重要的因素,并且应遵守处方处方指南,以使患者受益。目的:评估门诊处方中处方错误的发生频率和类型,并确定处方书写是否符合WHO的处方书写标准。材料和方法:在Anand市进行了横断面观察研究。在研究中包括在阿南德市从事不同专业的同素疗法私人执业者。同意后一个月开始收集处方,以最大程度地减少处方写作中的偏见。这些处方是在六个月内从阿南德市的当地药房收集的。根据世界卫生组织良好处方指南,对处方中的标准信息中的错误进行了分析。统计分析:进行描述性分析以估计错误发生的频率,数据以数字和百分比表示。结果:共收集到749张处方(549张手写和200张计算机化处方)。在手写处方中发现大量遗漏错误,例如,在药物项目中提到OPD编号占6.19%,提到患者的年龄占25.50%,提及性别,占17.30%,提及地址占9.29%,提及患者体重,占11.29%。通用名称仅处方了2.97%的药物。途径和剂型分别为77.35%-78.15%,剂量为47.25%,单位为13.91%,方案为72.93%,而signa(药物使用方向)为62.35%。在临床医生和患者详细信息中,发现了549张手写处方中的4384错误,以及200张计算机化处方中的501错误。在药品详细信息中,手写和计算机处方中识别出的错误总数分别为5015和621。结论:与手写处方相比,计算机处方似乎具有相对较低的错误率。由于门诊处方错误很多,并且经常发生在手写处方中,因此开处方者需要在日常实践中适应计算机化处方订单输入。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号