• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >The understanding of research ethics at health sciences schools in Jordan: a cross-sectional study
【24h】

The understanding of research ethics at health sciences schools in Jordan: a cross-sectional study

机译：约旦健康科学学校研究伦理的理解：横断面研究

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Research ethics is required for high-quality research that positively influences society. There is limited understanding of research ethics in Middle Eastern countries including Jordan. Here, we aim to investigate the level of understanding of research ethics principles among health sciences faculty members in Jordan. This is a cross sectional study where faculty members from the University of Jordan were surveyed for their knowledge and, attitude of research ethics principles. The study was conducted in the period between July 2016 to July 2017 using a customized-design questionnaire involving demographic data and participants’ contributions toward research, and assessment of participants’ knowledge, belief and attitude towards research ethics. Different question-formats have been used including multiple-choice, yes or no, and a four point Likert-type questions. Obtained responses were tabulated according to gender, academic-rank, and knowledge about research ethics principles. The study had a response rate of 51%. Among the 137 participants of this study, most (96%) were involved in human and animal research, yet, only 2/3 had prior training in research ethics. Moreover, 91% believed that investigators should have training in research ethics and 87% believed that there should be a mandatory postgraduate course on that. The average correct scores for correct understanding of researchers towards research ethics was 62%. Yet, there were some misconceptions about the major ethical principles as only 43% identified them correctly. Additionally, the role of research ethics committees was not well understood by most of the respondents. Although there is acceptable knowledge about research ethics, discrepancies in understanding in research ethics principles seems to exist. There is a large support for further training in responsible conduct of research by faculty in health sciences in Jordan. Thus, such training should be required by universities to address this knowledge gap in order to improve research quality and its impact on society.
机译：对社会产生积极影响的高质量研究需要研究伦理学。在包括约旦在内的中东国家研究道德的理解有限。在这里，我们的目标是调查Jordan健康科学教师成员研究伦理原则的理解水平。这是一个横断面研究，乔丹大学的教师为他们的知识和研究伦理原则的态度进行了调查。该研究在2016年7月至2017年7月期间，使用涉及人口统计数据和参与者对研究的贡献的定制设计问卷进行，评估参与者的知识，信仰和对研究道德的态度的贡献。已使用不同的问题格式，包括多项选择，是或否，以及四点李克特类型的问题。获得的反应根据性别，学术级别和关于研究伦理原则的知识制成。该研究的反应率为51％。在这项研究的137名参与者中，大多数（96％）涉及人类和动物研究，但只有2/3在研究伦理中训练。此外，91％的人认为，调查人员应该在研究伦理中进行培训，而87％的人认为应该有强制性研究生课程。对研究伦理研究人员的平均正确分数为62％。然而，有一些关于主要道德原则的误解，只有43％正确地确定了它们。此外，大多数受访者，研究伦理委员会的作用并不顺利。虽然有关研究道德的知识，但研究道德原则的理解差异似乎存在。大量支持在约旦的健康科学院负责任的研究中进一步培训。因此，大学应要求这种培训来解决这种知识缺口，以提高研究质量及其对社会的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号