...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Pain >Qualitative research and pain Current controversies and future directions
【24h】

Qualitative research and pain Current controversies and future directions

机译:定性研究和痛苦目前的争论和未来方向

获取原文
           

摘要

Much of what we know about the meaning and experience of pain has been facilitated throughqualitative research. However, qualitative inquiry continues to be underrepresented in the painliterature relative to quantitative approaches. In this Commentary and Introduction to the SpecialIssue on Qualitative Research and Pain, we present a collection of high-quality, cutting-edgequalitative studies in pain that highlight theoretical and methodological advancements in thefield. The articles included in this Special Issue feature a range of designs (e.g., grounded theory,phenomenology, qualitative description), methods of data collection (e.g., interviews, object elici-tation, photovoice), and populations (e.g., immigrant women, individuals with heart disease).Throughout this Commentary we also address three common controversies regarding the qualityof qualitative research and the stance we took on them for the Issue. These primarily deal with theprocedure-related issues of sample size, generalizability, and saturation. We discuss how a moresubstantive-centered approach to evaluation—that is, an approach that considers the methodolo-gical and theoretical significance of the work—is crucial for advancing qualitative research in pain.
机译:我们对痛苦的意义和经验的了解是有促进的,通过了解研究。然而,与定量方法相比,痛苦中的定性查询继续受到痛苦。在这种评论和介绍了定性研究和痛苦的专辑,我们展示了一系列高质量,切削态度的痛苦研究,突出了田野的理论和方法进展。本特殊问题中包含的文章具有一系列设计(例如,接地理论,现象学,定性描述),数据收集方法(例如,访谈,对象Elici-Tative,Photovoice)和群体(例如,移民妇女,个人随着心脏病).Througoutoutouthous,我们还解决了三种常见争议,就质量研究和我们对此问题的立场。这些主要涉及样本大小,概括性和饱和的方法相关的问题。我们讨论了莫斯鲁斯特的居中的评价方法 - 即考虑工作的方法 - Gigal和理论意义的方法 - 对于推进痛苦的定性研究至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号