...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ciencia e Saude Coletiva >Sa?ode Coletiva e uma escolha de Sofia: defender a privacidade no ciberespa?§o
【24h】

Sa?ode Coletiva e uma escolha de Sofia: defender a privacidade no ciberespa?§o

机译：SA？集体和选择索非亚：捍卫网络帕帕的隐私？

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The world is currently experiencing complex threats to privacy in health (PH) in the context of the growing virtualization of bodies and biographies exposed in social networks. This paper aims to identify the approaches to PH in Brazilian scientific production in the light of Collective Health (CH). This is an exploratory, analytical-descriptive study reviewingpapers from Brazilian Collective Health journals of excellence from 2000 to 2017. Papers employing PH as their object were selected for further analysis. We found that papers are commonly anchored in the perspective that the “professional’s fear of punishment” is the borderline inhibiting PH violation actions. However, neither the legal-normative framework nor the technological security apparatus sufficed. In the Unified Health System (SUS), threats escalate in initiatives of the SUS Card, PEP, Regulatory Centers and Telehealth. The results corroborate a hypothetic gap in the production of the subject in Collective Health journals of excellence. The discussion is about institutional omission; adoption of the ICF for the use of individual data; opacity on the revenue of public expenditure in the technological security apparatus. Respect for PH must bethe result of a political-ethical agreement, in which all start to act ethically in defense of privacy by choice and not coercion and fear of penalties.
机译：在社交网络中越来越多的虚拟化的背景下，世界目前正在对健康（pH）的隐私威胁进行复杂的威胁。本文旨在鉴定在集体健康（CH）的光线下识别巴西科学生产的pH值。这是从2000年至2017年的巴西集体健康期刊的探索性的分析描述性研究审查纸，从2000年到2017年。选择使用pH作为其对象的论文进行进一步分析。我们发现论文普遍存在的角度来看，“专业对惩罚的恐惧”是逆行抑制pH违规行为。但是，合法规范框架和技术安全装置都不具有足够的技术安全装置。在统一的卫生系统（SUS）中，威胁在SU卡，PEP，监管中心和远程医疗的举措中升级。结果证实了卓越的集体健康期刊的主题的假设差距。讨论是关于制度遗漏;通过ICF用于使用个人数据;技术安全装置公共支出收入不合理。尊重pH必须允许政治伦理协议的结果，其中一切都开始通过选择而捍卫隐私，而不是强迫和恐惧处罚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号