• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cogent Food & Agriculture >Scale-wide evaluation and promotion of improved teff technologies under dryland scenario: Economic profitability, farmers’ preference and constraints in Northeast Amhara, Ethiopia
【24h】

Scale-wide evaluation and promotion of improved teff technologies under dryland scenario: Economic profitability, farmers’ preference and constraints in Northeast Amhara, Ethiopia

机译：Dryland情景下改进Teff技术的尺度范围内评价与推广：经济盈利，农民偏爱东北阿哈拉，埃塞俄比亚的偏好和制约因素

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Despite number of improved teff varieties with their production package (teff technologies, here after) are released/recommended for dryland areas, failure to integrate farmers’ desired traits and profitability analysis weakened their adoption rate. Scale-wide participatory evaluation and promotion of improved teff technologies was thus conducted to assess their profitability, farmer preferences and constraints in Northeast Amhara drylands. Zoble and Kuncho improved teff technologies were compared with the local teff production practice for three consecutive years on un-replicated farms using 270 farmers. All necessary data were collected and analyzed in descriptive statistics, cost-benefit ratio, weighted matrix and poisson regression model. Therefore, Zoble teff provided 1620 and 1280?kgha~(?1) average yield in Sekota and Lasta districts, respectively. Kuncho teff provided average yield of 1830 and 1420?kgha~(?1) in Lasta and Sekota districts. They also ensured 3.7 and 4.5?ETB return for 1?ETB investment on production costs in Sekota and Lasta districts, orderly. Moreover, Zoble and Kuncho teff were primary and secondary choices of farmers in Sekota, and vice-versa in Lasta. The regression result revealed that except land holding size of the household head, other significant factors (sex, family size, training and credit access) were positively influenced teff technology package application. Hence, Zoble and Kuncho teff technologies should further diffuse to Sekota and Lasta districts, respectively. Providing access to package components, eminence training and credit services is worthwhile to enhance farmers’ technology package application. Agricultural mechanization research also should take an initiative to design labor relaxing devices to ease the labor pressure imposed by large farm size.
机译：尽管有所改善 Teff品种与其生产包（ Teff Technologies之后）被释放/推荐用于旱地区域，未能将农民所需的特质和盈利能力分析削弱其采用率。因此，进行了级别的参与性评估和促进改进的 Teff技术，以评估其在东北阿哈拉旱地的盈利能力，农民偏好和限制。 Zoble和 Kuncho改善了将Teff技术与当地 Teff生产实践相比，连续三年在未经270名农民的未复制农场上进行比较。收集所有必要的数据，并以描述性统计，成本效益比，加权矩阵和泊松回归模型分析。因此， Zoble Teff分别为Sekota和Lasta区的平均产量提供1620和1280？KGHA〜（？1）。 Kuncho Teff提供了1830年和1420年的平均产量？KGHA〜（？1）在Lasta和Sekota区。他们还确保了3.7和4.5？ETB返回1？ETB对Sekota和Lasta地区的生产成本的投资，有序。此外， Zoble和 Kuncho Teff是Sekota农民的主要和中学选择，反之亦然。回归结果表明，除了家庭头部的土地持有规模，其他重大因素（性别，家庭规模，培训和信贷访问）是积极影响的 Teff技术包应用。因此， Zoble和 Kuncho Teff技术应分别弥漫于Sekota和Lasta区。提供对包装组件的访问权限，Eminence培训和信用服务是值得加强农民的技术包应用。农业机械化研究还应主动设计劳动放松设备，以缓解大型农场大小施加的劳动力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号