...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cogent Food & Agriculture >Comparing high-density plantation (HDP) system and the conventional plantation system of apple cultivation in Mustang and Manang districts of Nepal
【24h】

Comparing high-density plantation (HDP) system and the conventional plantation system of apple cultivation in Mustang and Manang districts of Nepal

机译：比较高密度种植园（HDP）系统和尼泊尔锰栽培苹果栽培常规种植体系

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study was conducted to assess the comparative economic analysis of the High density and conventional systems of apple cultivation. It also aimed to compare crop managerial practices in two cultivation systems and major problems involved in the production of apples in the study area. A total of 125 farmers from two districts, Manang and Mustang, were selected by simple random sampling technique and interviewed with a pre-tested semi-structured interview schedule of which 60 were HDP practitioners and 65 were conventional practitioners. Chi-square test and independent sample t-test were used for data analysis using SPSS and MS-Excel. Drip irrigation system, regular training pruning, low weeding frequency, chemical source of nutrient management were some distinguishing managerial practices in the high-density plantation system. Pit manuring, flooding irrigation, intercropping, high weeding frequency were found to be more common in the conventional system. Unavailability of saplings and fertilizers (0.79) and lack of post-harvest storage (0.76) were major problems reported by high-density practitioners and conventional practitioners respectively. The economic analysis revealed a benefit-cost ratio of 0.35, 0.80, and 1.39 in the HDP system and benefit-cost ratio of 1.60, 1.68, and 1.72 in the conventional system for the years 2017, 2018, and 2019 respectively. The increasing benefit-cost ratio in the high-density plantation system, even when being in the initial establishment phase can be expected to be more profitable when all plants reach the full production phase. The conventional system is still profitable but high density is promising as it can give more profit per unit of land.
机译：进行了本研究以评估苹果栽培高密度和常规系统的比较经济分析。它还旨在比较两种培养系统中的作物管理实践以及参与研究区苹果生产中的主要问题。通过简单的随机抽样技术选择了来自两个地区，曼旺和野马的125名农民，并采访了预先测试的半结构化访谈计划，其中60名HDP从业者，65名是传统从业者。 Chi-Square测试和独立样品T检验用于使用SPSS和MS-Excel进行数据分析。滴灌系统，定期培训修剪，低次频率，化学源管理源在高密度种植体系中有一些区别的管理实践。在传统系统中发现坑灌浆，洪水灌溉，间作，高次射频频率在传统系统中更为常见。树苗和肥料的不可用（0.79）和收获后储存（0.76）分别是高密度从业者和传统从业者报告的主要问题。经济分析揭示了在2017年，2018年和2019年的传统系统中的HDP系统和1.60,1.68和1.72中的0.35,0.80和1.39的优惠 - 成本比。即使在初始建立阶段，高密度种植园系统中的效益成本比越来越多，也可以在所有植物达到全部生产阶段时更有利可图。传统系统仍然有利可图，但高密度是有前途的，因为它可以提供更多的土地利润。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号