...
首页> 外文期刊>College & Research Libraries >The Boolean is Dead, Long Live the Boolean! Natural Language versus Boolean Searching in Introductory Undergraduate Instruction
【24h】

The Boolean is Dead, Long Live the Boolean! Natural Language versus Boolean Searching in Introductory Undergraduate Instruction

机译:布尔已经死了,长时间的放在布尔!自然语言与布尔搜索在介绍性本科教学中

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Boolean logic can be a difficult concept for first‐year, introductory students to grasp. This paper compares the results of Boolean and natural language searching across several databases with searches created from student research questions. Performance differences between databases varied. Overall, natural search language is at least as good as Boolean searching. With evidence that students struggle to grasp Boolean searching, and may not use it even after instruction, it could be left out of first‐year instruction, freeing up valuable class time to focus on concepts such as question development and source evaluation. As the Framework for Information Literary does not specifically address Boolean operators, the authors suggest it should have less prominence in first‐year Information Literacy instruction.
机译:布尔逻辑可能是一年的艰难概念,介绍学生掌握。本文比较了从学生研究问题创建的搜索的多个数据库中搜索的布尔和自然语言的结果。数据库之间的性能差异变化。总体而言,自然搜索语言至少与布尔搜索一样好。有证据表明,学生们努力掌握布尔搜索,也可能不会在指导之后使用它,它可以遗漏一年的指导,释放有价值的课程时间,专注于诸如问题开发和源评估等概念。由于信息文学的框架没有特别地解决布尔运营商,作者表明它应该在一年内信息素养教学中突出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号