• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Comparative Literature: East & West >Academic Barbarism Reconsidered—A Comparative Study of Vladimir Nabokov’s Pnin and Qian Zhongshu’s Fortress Besieged
【24h】

Academic Barbarism Reconsidered—A Comparative Study of Vladimir Nabokov’s Pnin and Qian Zhongshu’s Fortress Besieged

机译：学术野蛮重新考虑 - 弗拉基米尔·纳比科夫的PNIN和钱中舍的堡垒的比较研究

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In Academic Barbarism , Michael O’Sullivan coins the eponymous term and analyzes its diverse manifestations. He believes that the notion is worthy of more attention both in academia and beyond. This essay examines Nabokov’s Pnin and Qian’s Fortress Besieged in light of Michel Henry’s theory of barbarism as suppression of life. The essay unfolds around three essential questions in academia that concern both authors: the intrusion of the power structure of society into academia; the rampant scientism in academia; and academics’ blind faith in pedagogy. I argue that, writing some sixty years ago, Nabokov and Qian were already aware of the multiple educational problems that beset academia, thus qualifying them as prophets of the academic barbarism that is looming large on the horizon of today’s higher education.
机译：在学术野蛮主义中，Michael O'Sullivan将同名术语硬币并分析其各种表现形式。他认为，在学术界和超越中，这些概念值得更多关注。本文审查了Nabokov的 Pnin和Qian的围困偏见了Michel Henry的野蛮理论作为抑制生活。本文展开了关于作者的学术界三个基本问题：社会权力结构的侵入学术界;学术界的猖獗科学主义;和学者对教育学的盲目信仰。我争辩说，六十年前的写作，纳巴科夫和钱都已经意识到了学术界的多个教育问题，因此将他们作为学术野蛮的先知，在今天的高等教育的地平线上覆盖了大型教育。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号