【24h】

At the Click of a Button

机译:点击一个按钮

获取原文
           

摘要

A number of browser extension tools have emerged in the past decade aimed at helping informationseekers find open versions of scholarly articles when they hit a paywall, including Open AccessButton, Lazy Scholar, Kopernio, and Unpaywall. While librarians have written numerous reviews ofthese products, no one has yet conducted a usability study on these tools. This article details ausability study involving six undergraduate students and six faculty at a large public researchuniversity in the United States. Participants were tasked with installing each of the four tools as wellas trying them out on three test articles. Both students and faculty tended to favor simple, cleandesign elements and straightforward functionality that enabled them to use the tools with limitedinstruction. Participants familiar with other browser extensions gravitated towards tools like OpenAccess Button, whereas those less experienced with other extensions preferred tools that loadautomatically, such as Unpaywall.
机译:在过去的十年中,一些浏览器扩展工具已经出现了旨在帮助信息查找在PayWall上找到公开版本的学术文章,包括Open AccessButton,Lazy Scholar,Kopernio和Unpaywall。虽然图书馆员撰写了众多的备受知识产权的评论,但没有人对这些工具进行了可用性研究。本文详细说明了可爱的研究涉及六名本科生和六名教师在美国的大型公共研究大学。参与者的任务是安装四个工具中的每一个,因为在三个测试文章中尝试它们。学生和教师往往有利于简单,清洁的元素和直接的功能,使他们能够使用有限的工具。熟悉其他浏览器扩展的参与者倾向于OpenAccess按钮等工具,而与其他扩展的经验不太经验,则Loadautomical(例如UnpayWall)的优先工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号