...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Insights >‘At-risk articles’: the imperative to recover lost science
【24h】

‘At-risk articles’: the imperative to recover lost science

机译：'风险条款'：恢复失去科学的必要条件

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Deceptive publishers have been discussed and written about from a multitude of perspectives and in avariety of disciplines, but scant attention has been devoted to a particular aspect of the issue: How weas scholarly communities are dealing with the research that appears in these outlets. It is problematicthat the question is not being addressed, as this research is at risk of being lost. It is at risk becausearticles that appear in deceptive publications are not indexed, so they are less visible, discoverable andcitable. Additionally, they are not preserved and therefore likely to disappear should the publisher ceaseits activities or neglect to carry out basic maintenance on their archives and servers. Furthermore, it isparticularly problematic because this lost science is potentially valuable. In this article, it is argued that,rather than continuing to risk the loss of this potentially important research by ignoring its existence,research disciplines should look at developments in open peer review and the increasing use of preprintservers for their potential to recover and reintegrate these at-risk articles into the scholarly record.
机译：已经讨论和编写了欺骗性出版商，并从大量的角度讨论和编写了纪律的令人报而来，但是对问题的一个特定方面致力于Scant的关注：WeS学术社区如何处理这些网点中出现的研究。问题没有解决问题，因为这项研究有丢失的风险。它处于欺骗性出版物中出现的危险因素而不是索引，因此它们不太可见，可发现和可燃。此外，它们不保留，因此如果出版商停止活动或忽视对其档案和服务器进行基本维护，则可能会消失。此外，它是神秘的问题，因为这种遗失的科学可能有价值。在本文中，据称，通过忽视其存在，研究学科应该忽视开放同行评审的发展和预印的潜力，以越来越多地危险，而不是继续冒险危险这一潜在的重要研究在学术纪录中的风险条款。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号