...
首页> 外文期刊>International braz j urol >Use of preoperative embolization prior to Transplant nephrectomy
【24h】

Use of preoperative embolization prior to Transplant nephrectomy

机译:在移植前术前栓塞在移植肾切除术之前

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction After a failed transplant, management of a non-functional graft with pain or recurrent infections can be challenging. Transplant nephrectomy (TN) can be a morbid procedure with the potential for significant blood loss. Embolization of the renal artery alone has been proposed as a method of reducing complications from an in vivo failed kidney transplant. While this does yield less morbidity, it may not address an infected graft or refractory hematuria or rejection. We elected to begin preoperative embolization to assess if this would help decrease the blood loss and transfusion rate associated with TN. Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent non-emergent TN at our institution. Patients who had functioning grafts that later failed were included in analysis. TN was performed for recurrent infections, pain or hematuria. We evaluated for blood loss (EBL) during TN, transfusion rate and length of hospital stay. Results A total of 16 patients were identified. Nine had preoperative embolization or no blood flow to the graft prior to TN. The remaining 7 did not have preoperative embolization. The shortest time from transplant to TN was 8 months and the longest 18 years with an average of 6.3 years. Average EBL for the embolized patients (ETN) was 143.9cc compared to 621.4cc in the non-embolized (NETN) group (p=0.041). Average number of units of blood transfused was 0.44 in the ETN with only 3/9 patients requiring transfusion. The NETN patients had average of 1.29 units transfused with 5/7 requiring transfusion. The length of stay was longer for the ETN (5.4 days) compared to 3.9 in the NETN. No intraoperative complications were seen in either group and only one patient had a postoperative ileus in the NETN. Conclusion Embolization prior to TN significantly decreases the EBL but does not significantly decrease transfusion rate. However, patients do require a significantly longer hospitalization with embolization due to the time needed for embolization. Larger studies are needed to determine if embolization before transplant nephrectomy reduces the transfusion rates and overall complications.
机译:引入移植失败后,使用疼痛或复发感染的非功能性移植物的管理可能具有挑战性。移植肾切除术(TN)可以是具有显着失血潜力的病态手术。仅提出单独肾动脉的栓塞作为减少体内失败的肾移植失败的并发症的方法。虽然这确实产生了较少的发病率,但它可能没有解决感染的移植物或难治性血尿或排斥。我们选择开始术前栓塞,以评估这是否有助于降低与TN相关的血液损失和输血率。材料和方法我们对在我们所在机构进行非新兴TN的患者进行了回顾性分析。在分析中包括以后失败的移植物的患者。进行TN用于复发感染,疼痛或血尿。我们在TN期间评估了血液损失(EBL),输血率和住院时间长度。结果共鉴定了16名患者。在TN之前,九个有术前栓塞或没有血液流向移植物。剩下的7没有术前栓塞。从移植到TN的最短时间为8个月,最长的18年,平均为6.3岁。栓塞患者(ETN)的平均EBL为143.9cc,而非栓塞(NetN)组中的621.4cc(P = 0.041)。在ETN中,平均血液单位单位数为0.44,只有3/9患者需要输血。 NetN患者的平均每单位为1.29单位,用5/7输血转移。与NetN中的3.9相比,ETN(5.4天)的逗留时间更长。在任一组中没有看到术中并发症,只有一个患者在网管中只有一个患者患者。结论TN之前的栓塞明显降低EBL,但不会显着降低输血率。然而,由于栓塞所需的时间,患者确实需要栓塞的显着住院治疗。需要更大的研究来确定移植肾切除术前的栓塞是否降低输血率和整体并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号