...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Traditional vs. Contemporary Management Control Practices for Developing Public Health Policies
【24h】

Traditional vs. Contemporary Management Control Practices for Developing Public Health Policies

机译：发展公共卫生政策的传统与当代管理控制实践

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Public health policies must address multiple goals and complex community health needs. Recently, management control practices have emerged to provide a broader type of information for evaluating the effectiveness of healthcare policies, and relate activities and processes to multiple strategic outcomes. This study compares the effect of traditional and contemporary management control practices on the achievement of public health policies. It is also analyzed how two different uses of such practices (enabling vs. coercive) facilitate the achievement of public health policies. Relationships are explored using data collected from managers from public health agencies and public hospitals in Spain. The findings show that contemporary management control practices are more suitable than traditional practices to achieve public health policies. Furthermore, results show that public health policies are better achieved when managers use management control practices in an enabling way rather than in a coercive way.
机译：公共卫生政策必须解决多项目标和复杂的社区健康需求。最近，已经出现了管理管制实践，以提供更广泛的信息，用于评估医疗保健政策的有效性，以及将活动和流程与多种战略结果相关联。本研究比较了传统和当代管理管制实践对公共卫生政策实现的影响。还分析了这种做法的两种不同用途（使与胁迫）有助于实现公共卫生政策。利用来自西班牙公共卫生机构和公立医院的管理人员收集的数据探索了关系。调查结果表明，当代管理控制实践比传统习俗更适合，以实现公共卫生政策。此外，结果表明，当管理者以支持方式而不是强制性方式使用管理控制实践时，可以更好地实现公共卫生政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号