...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Business and Management >Performance Evaluation of Inspection and Protection Techniques Used in the Great Man-Made River Project in Libya
【24h】

Performance Evaluation of Inspection and Protection Techniques Used in the Great Man-Made River Project in Libya

机译：利比亚伟大人造河工程中使用的检查和保护技术的绩效评估

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

It is noted that most of the Internal Auditors at GMRA who conduct their audits based on ISO Standards were not able to recognize many qualitative indicators for failure by the ways of doing of these audits, a decision was taken to develop this evaluation method through determining the applicability of use of other evaluation methods and select the most suitable one. The selected one will be developed to the extent that would enable the Auditors and their organization to predict for any future failure.. The methods those were reviewed in this study are ; Failure mode and effect analysis "FMEA", Benchmarking, Self assessment Model (EFQM) and Auditing by process approach. A critical analysis of these methods was started by formulating a set of criteria , which has enabled the organisation to select most suitable method. The research methodology was based on the review of; QMS Documentation, Results of internal audits, Minutes of Annual Management Review Meetings of 2013, Records of failures & investigation studies and recovery/remedial works taken place. The score and measurement criteria has supported the selection and conclusion that " Auditing by Process Approach " is the most suitable one for GMRA which can be used to evaluate the performance of pipeline and its monitoring / inspection / protection techniques, if it is supported by other measurement technique, i.e. the FMEA. The results supported this finding under the condition of accommodating of an additional measurement by FMEA method that depends on the Risk Assessment associated with each process to be audited, and this has helped the Auditors for prediction for future failures, but no evidence found for identifying the qualitative indicators. Therefore it is recommended to conduct further investigation to assess whether the accommodating of the other individual evaluation techniques into the Auditing by Process Approach method will improve the Auditors capability for determining the qualitative indicators, and to what extent?
机译：有人指出，大多数基于ISO标准进行审计的最大的内部审计师都无法通过执行这些审计的方式来识别许多定性指标，通过确定来制定这种评估方法的决定。使用其他评估方法的适用性并选择最合适的。将开发所选择的一个，这将使审计师及其组织能够预测未来任何未来的失败。这项研究中审查的方法是;失败模式和效果分析“FMEA”，基准，自我评估模型（EFQM）与过程方法审计。通过制定一组标准，启动对这些方法的关键分析，该标准已经使组织能够选择最合适的方法。研究方法基于审查; QMS文件，内部审核结果，2013年年度管理审查会议的分钟，故障记录和调查研究和恢复/补救措施所采取的。分数和测量标准支持的选择和结论，即“通过过程方法审计”是最适合的标准标准，可用于评估管道的性能及其监测/检查/保护技术，如果它得到其他支持测量技术，即FMEA。结果支持此发现根据FMEA方法的额外测量的条件，这取决于与每个进程相关的风险评估，这有助于审计师对未来的失败预测，但没有发现识别的证据定性指标。因此，建议进行进一步调查，以评估其他单独评估技术是否通过过程方法方法的审计，将改善审计员能够确定定性指标以及在多大程度上？

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号