首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Para-acetabular Radiopaque Densities in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Retrospective Assessment of Prevalence and Characteristics
【24h】

Para-acetabular Radiopaque Densities in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Retrospective Assessment of Prevalence and Characteristics

机译:股骨旁抗辐射患者的乙酰髋臼射线辐射密度:对患病率和特征的回顾性评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome is a common source of hip pain associated with chondrolabral injury. There is a subset of patients with FAI syndrome who present with radiopaque densities (RODs) adjacent to the acetabular rim. Purpose: To evaluate the prevalence, characteristics, and patient-specific factors associated with RODs adjacent to the acetabulum in patients treated with hip arthroscopy for symptomatic FAI. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Between November 2014 and March 2018, a total of 296 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI with a labral tear were reviewed retrospectively. Patient-specific variables were collected, including age, sex, lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), and alpha angle. Imaging (computed tomography) and surgical reports were reviewed for the location and characteristics of RODs, as well as subsequent labral treatment technique. Patients were excluded if they were treated for extra-articular hip pathology, had a revision procedure, or had a diagnosis other than FAI with a labral tear. No patient was excluded for any history of systemic inflammatory disease. Binary logistic regression was used to compare age, LCEA, and alpha angle for patients with or without radiopaque fragments. An alpha level of 0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance. Results: A total of 204 patients met inclusion criteria; 33 patients (16.2%; 16 males, 17 females) had para-acetabular RODs. There were no statistically significant differences in age ( P = .82), sex ( P = .92), LCEA ( P = .24), or alpha angle ( P = .10) among patients with or without an ROD. Of the 33 patients, 29 (87.9%) had fragments in the anterosuperior quadrant. Overall, 31 patients (93.9%) were treated with labral repair in addition to correction of the underlying bony impingement, while 2 patients (6.1%) underwent focal labral debridement owing to poor labral tissue quality around the RODs. Twenty-five patients (76%) had identifiable RODs, which were excised at the time of surgery. The mean (± SD) ROD size measured on axial and coronal computed tomography imaging was 6.3 ± 5.5 mm and 4 ± 4.5 mm, respectively. Conclusion: Age, sex, LCEA, and alpha angle were not predictive of the presence of para-acetabular RODs. Approximately one-sixth of all patients with FAI had RODs identified on computed tomography, which were typically located at the anterosuperior acetabulum. The majority of hips with para-acetabular RODs were amenable to labral repair. The relative prevalence and lack of predictive patient-specific indicators for these fragments suggest that a high degree of suspicion is necessary when evaluating patients with FAI.
机译:背景:股骨旁抗冲突(FAI)综合征是与软骨起动损伤相关的髋关节疼痛的常见来源。有一种患者的FAI综合征患者,其呈现与髋臼边缘相邻的无线电通孔(棒)。目的:评价与髋关节镜检查患者邻近髋臼穴位邻近髋关节疗法的患者的患病率,特征和患者特异性因素。研究设计:案例系列;证据级别,4.方法:2014年11月至2018年3月期间,回顾性地审查了296例接受髋关节关节镜的髋关节视镜的患者。收集患者特异性变量,包括年龄,性别,横向中心边角(LCEA)和α角。对杆的位置和特征进行了审查了成像(计算断层扫描)和手术报告,以及随后的求助处理技术。如果患者被排除在治疗外关节髋关节病理学,则进行修订程序,或者诊断除了具有效果的FAI之外。没有患者被排除在任何全身炎症疾病的历史中。二进制逻辑回归用于比较有或没有无线电缺陷碎片的患者的年龄,液体和α角。 α水平为0.05才用于表示统计学意义。结果:共有204名患者符合纳入标准; 33名患者(16.2%; 16名男性,17名女性)具有乙腺杆。年龄没有统计学意义(p = .82),性别(p = .92),lecea(p = .24),或没有杆的患者的α(p = .10)。在33例患者中,29例(87.9%)在翼状象限中有碎片。总体而言,31例患者(93.9%)除了纠正底层的骨骼冲击之外,还用LABRAL修复治疗,而2名患者(6.1%)由于杆周围的较差的较差的LABRAL组织质量而接受了局灶性的患者。二十五名患者(76%)具有可识别的棒,在手术时被切除。在轴向和冠状动脉检查断层扫描成像上测量的平均值(±SD)棒尺寸分别为6.3±5.5毫米和4±4.5毫米。结论:年龄,性别,LCEA和α角没有预测对髋臼杆的存在。所有FAI患者的大约六分之六是在计算断层扫描上识别的棒,其通常位于acetoIoriorAcetabulum。大多数髋关节棒的臀部均可享受效果。这些片段的相对患病率和缺乏预测患者特异性指标表明,在评估FAI患者时,需要高度怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号