...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Safety and Health at Work >Classified Chemicals in Accordance with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals: Comparison of Lists of the European Union, Japan, Malaysia and New Zealand
【24h】

Classified Chemicals in Accordance with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals: Comparison of Lists of the European Union, Japan, Malaysia and New Zealand

机译：根据“化学品”的全球分类和标签制度，分类化学品：欧盟，日本，马来西亚和新西兰名单的比较

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) was developed to enhance chemical classification and hazard communication systems worldwide. However, some of the elements such as building blocks and data sources have the potential to cause “disharmony” to the GHS, particularly in its classification results. It is known that some countries have developed their own lists of classified chemicals in accordance with the GHS to “standardize” the classification results within their respective countries. However, the lists of classified chemicals may not be consistent among these countries. Method In this study, the lists of classified chemicals developed by the European Union, Japan, Malaysia, and New Zealand were selected for comparison of classification results for carcinogenicity, germ cell mutagenicity, and reproductive toxicity. Results The findings show that only 54%, 66%, and 37% of the classification results for each Carcinogen, Mutagen and Reproductive toxicants hazard classes, respectively are the same among the selected countries. This indicates a “moderate” level of consistency among the classified chemicals lists. Conclusion By using classification results for the carcinogenicity, germ cell mutagenicity, and reproductive toxicity hazard classes, this study demonstrates the “disharmony” in the classification results among the selected countries. We believe that the findings of this study deserve the attention of the relevant international bodies.
机译：背景技术制定了“化学品（GHS）的全球分类和标签系统”，以增强全球化学分类和危险通信系统。然而，诸如构建块和数据源之类的一些元素具有可能导致GHS的“Distralony”，特别是在其分类结果中。众所周知，一些国家根据GHS向其各自国家的分类结果制定了自己的分类化学品列表。但是，分类化学品列表可能在这些国家之间不一致。本研究中的方法，选择了欧盟，日本，马来西亚和新西兰开发的分类化学品列表，用于比较致癌性，生殖细胞崩溃性和生殖毒性的分类结果。结果结果表明，每个致癌物质，诱变和生殖毒物危害课程的分类结果仅为54％，66％和37％，分别是所选国家的相同。这表明分类化学品列表中的“中等”一致性。结论通过使用致癌性，生殖细胞崩溃性和生殖毒性危害课程的分类结果，本研究表明了所选国家的分类结果中的“不和谐”。我们认为这项研究的结果值得有关国际机构的注意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号