...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>SAGE Open >Discussion in Postsecondary Classrooms: A Review of the Literature
【24h】

Discussion in Postsecondary Classrooms: A Review of the Literature

机译：讨论在后期教室：对文献的审查

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Spoken language is, arguably, the primary means by which teachers teach and students learn. Much of the literature on language in classrooms has focused on discussion that is seen as both a method of instruction and a curricular outcome. While much of the research on discussion has focused on K-12 classrooms, there is also a body of research examining the efficacy of discussion in postsecondary settings. This article provides a review of this literature in order to consider the effect of discussion on student learning in college and university classrooms, the prevalence of discussion in postsecondary settings, and the quality of discussion in these settings. In general, the results of research on the efficacy of discussion in postsecondary settings are mixed. More seriously, researchers have not been explicit about the meaning of discussion and much of what is called discussion in this body of research is merely recitation with minimal levels of student participation. Although the research on discussion in college and university classrooms is inconclusive, some implications can be drawn from this review of the research including the need for future researchers to clearly define what they mean by a??discussion.a??
机译：可以说，语言是教师教学和学生学习的主要方式。在教室中语言的大部分文献都集中在被视为一种教学方法和课程结果的讨论。虽然大部分关于讨论的研究专注于K-12教室，但还有一个研究讨论在后期设置中的疗效。本文审查了本文文献，以考虑讨论在大学和大学教室中的学生学习，讨论中讨论的普遍存在的讨论以及这些设置中的讨论质量。一般而言，混合研究讨论中讨论效能的研究结果。更严重的是，研究人员没有明确讨论的意义，并且在这项研究体内所谓的讨论的大部分是仅重新考虑最小的学生参与。虽然关于大学和大学教室的讨论的研究不确定，但可以从对该研究的审查中提取一些影响，包括需要未来的研究人员的需要清楚地定义他们的讨论.A ??

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号