• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Social Media + Society >Margins as Methods, Margins as Ethics: A Feminist Framework for Studying Online Alterity
【24h】

Margins as Methods, Margins as Ethics: A Feminist Framework for Studying Online Alterity

机译：边缘作为方法，边缘作为道德：一个女性主义框架，用于研究在线遵守

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Prevailing theories of marginalized media position the work of resistance as beneath or less than the institutions against which resistance works, raising a number of methodological and ethical challenges for research on online alterity. We offer a margins-as-methods approach for studies of social media on the margins, directing critical attention to the theoretical, ethical, and political implications of positioning subsets of social media users as peripheral to an imagined center. Drawing on theories of feminist reflexivity and our own fieldwork experiences, we articulate the margins-as-methods approach through two sets of practices: deconstructing the power politics behind theories of alterity and identifying how these power politics shape every stage of the research process. We conclude by offering guiding questions for researchers to reflect on as they evaluate the methodological and ethical challenges specific to their projects. The margins-as-methods approach and the reflexive questions it raises build accountability for how our research process may reinscribe the very power relationships that we, alongside our interlocutors, work to contest.
机译：边缘化媒体的普遍理论将阻力的工作定位，如下所示，抵抗抵抗工作的机构，提高了对在线改造的研究的许多方法论和道德挑战。我们为在利润率上进行社交媒体研究的边缘和方法，引导关键关注社交媒体用户定位子集作为想象中心的外围的理论，道德和政治影响。借鉴女权主义反射性和我们自己的实地工作经验，我们通过两套实践阐述了边缘的途径：解构了改变理论背后的权力政治，并确定了这些电力政治如何形状的研究过程的每个阶段。我们通过为研究人员提供指导问题，以指导研究人员来反思，因为它们评估了对其项目特定的方法和道德挑战。边缘的备线方法和反身题材提高了对我们的研究过程如何重新汲取的权力关系来构建问责制，我们与对话者一起努力竞争的权力关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号